ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020
Challenges for Clinical Development of Vaccines for Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Infections.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled analyses of Clostridioides difficile vaccine trials identify baseline predictors for vaccine response.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The dynamic interplay betweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Taming Superbugs: Current Progress and Challenges in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Killed whole-cell Staphylococcus aureus formulation in Montanide ISA266 and Alum adjuvants: different vaccine formulations varied in the vaccine's potency and efficacy.Immunologic research · 2025Article
- Article
- Harnessing Non-Antibiotic Strategies to Counter Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Pathogens with Special Reference to Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Coatings.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Precision bacterial immunotherapy: an integrated mechanistic taxonomy and translational roadmap against antimicrobial resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Monophosphoryl lipid A as a co-adjuvant in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vaccine development: improvement of immune responses in a mouse model of infection.Immunologic research · 2024Article
- Monoclonal Antibodies as a Therapeutic Strategy against Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections in a Post-COVID-19 Era.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- BacScan: a novel genome-wide strategy for uncovering broadly immunogenic proteins in bacteria.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Vaccination is an integral strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance.PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Bacterial Vaccines Combating Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry.Vaccines · 2023Review
- The role of bacterial vaccines in the fight against antimicrobial resistance: an analysis of the preclinical and clinical development pipeline.The Lancet. Microbe · 2023Review
- Revisiting ESKAPE Pathogens: virulence, resistance, and combating strategies focusing on quorum sensing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Transient comparison of techniques to counter multi-drug resistant bacteria: prime modules in curation of bacterial infections.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2023Review
- Immunotherapies against human bacterial and fungal infectious diseases: A review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Nanobiotics against antimicrobial resistance: harnessing the power of nanoscale materials and technologies.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Variability of murine bacterial pneumonia models used to evaluate antimicrobial agents.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Expert workshop summary: Advancing toward a standardized murine model to evaluate treatments for antimicrobial resistance lung infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Differential binding of human and murine IgGs to catalytic and cell wall binding domains of Staphylococcus aureus peptidoglycan hydrolases.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing antibiotic resistance in bacteria causing endogenous infections has entailed a need for innovative approaches to therapy and prophylaxis of these infections and raised a new interest in vaccines for prevention of colonization and infection by typically antibiotic resistant pathogens. Nevertheless, there has been a long history of failures in late stage clinical development of this type of vaccines, which remains not fully understood. This article provides an overview on present and past vaccine developments targeting nosocomial bacterial pathogens; it further highlights the specific challenges associated with demonstrating clinical efficacy of these vaccines and the facts to be considered in future study designs. Notably, these vaccines are mainly applied to subjects with preexistent immunity to the target pathogen, transient or chronic immunosuppression and ill-defined microbiome status. Unpredictable attack rates and changing epidemiology as well as highly variable genetic and immunological strain characteristics complicate the development. In views of the clinical need, re-thinking of the study designs and expectations seems warranted: first of all, vaccine development needs to be footed on a clear rationale for choosing the immunological mechanism of action and the optimal time point for vaccination, e.g., (1) prevention (or reduction) of colonization vs. prevention of infection and (2) boosting of a preexistent immune response vs. altering the quality of the immune response. Furthermore, there are different, probably redundant, immunological and microbiological defense mechanisms that provide protection from infection. Their interplay is not well-understood but as a consequence their effect might superimpose vaccine-mediated resolution of infection and lead to failure to demonstrate efficacy. This implies that improved characterization of patient subpopulations within the trial population should be obtained by pro- and retrospective analyses of trial data on subject level. Statistical and systems biology approaches could help to define immune and microbiological biomarkers that discern populations that benefit from vaccination from those where vaccines might not be effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.