Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849423›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Composition and Diversity of Natural Bacterial Communities in Mabisi, a Traditionally Fermented Milk.

Himoonga Bernard Moonga, Sijmen E Schoustra, Joost van den Heuvel, Anita R Linnemann, Md Sainur Samad, John Shindano, Eddy J Smid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial Resistance of Lactic Acid Bacteria fromAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Himoonga Bernard MoongaLaboratory of Food Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Sijmen E SchoustraLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Joost van den HeuvelLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Anita R LinnemannFood Quality and Design, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Md Sainur SamadDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen, Netherlands.
John ShindanoDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Eddy J SmidLaboratory of Food Microbiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many traditionally fermented milk products such as mabisi involve spontaneous fermentation, which can result in bacterial community composition variation due to selection pressure. The aim of this study was to determine the composition of bacterial communities in the different types of mabisi produced across Zambia and identify the factors that influence their composition. Samples of mabisi were collected across the country, and analyzed for pH and bacterial communities using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. We found that the bacterial community composition was dominated by members of two phyla, i.e., Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, from which the top 10 most abundant genera were

Indexed as

barotsefirmicuteslactic acid bacteriaLactococcusmicrobial communitiesselection pressuretongaZambia

Identifiers

PMID32849423
PMCPMC7406715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.