Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849417›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020

Harnessing the Microbiomes of Suppressive Composts for Plant Protection: From Metagenomes to Beneficial Microorganisms and Reliable Diagnostics.

Stefanie Lutz, Barbara Thuerig, Thomas Oberhaensli, Johanna Mayerhofer, Jacques G Fuchs, Franco Widmer, Florian M Freimoser, Christian H Ahrens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Residues from black soldier fly (Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefanie LutzAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Barbara ThuerigResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Department of Crop Sciences, Frick, Switzerland.
Thomas OberhaensliResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Department of Crop Sciences, Frick, Switzerland.
Johanna MayerhoferAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Ecology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jacques G FuchsResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Department of Crop Sciences, Frick, Switzerland.
Franco WidmerAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Ecology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Florian M FreimoserAgroscope, Research Group Phytopathology and Zoology in Fruit and Vegetable Production, Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Christian H AhrensAgroscope, Research Group Molecular Diagnostics, Genomics and Bioinformatics, Wädenswil, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil-borne diseases cause significant yield losses worldwide, are difficult to treat and often only limited options for disease management are available. It has long been known that compost amendments, which are routinely applied in organic and integrated farming as a part of good agricultural practice to close nutrient cycles, can convey a protective effect. Yet, the targeted use of composts against soil-borne diseases is hampered by the unpredictability of the efficacy. Several studies have identified and/or isolated beneficial microorganisms (i.e., bacteria, oomycetes, and fungi) from disease suppressive composts capable of suppressing pathogens (e.g.,

Indexed as

biocontrolcompostgenome assemblymechanism of actionmetagenomicsmicrobiomeorganic farmingstrain collection

Identifiers

PMID32849417
PMCPMC7406687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.