Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849371›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Great Tit (

Kasun H Bodawatta, Signe K Schierbech, Nanna R Petersen, Katerina Sam, Nick Bos, Knud A Jønsson, Michael Poulsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kasun H BodawattaNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Signe K SchierbechNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nanna R PetersenNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katerina SamBiology Centre of Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czechia.
Nick BosSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Knud A JønssonNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael PoulsenSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Natural History Museum Aarhus · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKCzech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The uropygial gland (preen gland) of birds plays an important role in maintaining feather integrity and hygiene. Although a few studies have demonstrated potential defensive roles of bacteria residing within these glands, the diversity and functions of the uropygial gland microbiota are largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the microbiota of great tit (

Indexed as

Bacillusculture-dependentculture-independentdefensive symbiontsKocuriapreen gland

Identifiers

PMID32849371
PMCPMC7401573
OpenAlexW3045864242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.