ReviewFrontiers in neurology2020
Neurostimulation and Reach-to-Grasp Function Recovery Following Acquired Brain Injury: Insight From Pre-clinical Rodent Models and Human Applications.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Evaluation of DeepLabCut Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for High-Precision Markerless Tracking in the Mouse Staircase Test.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Alzheimer's disease and other memory disorders in the age of AI: reflection and perspectives on the 120th anniversary of the birth of Dr. John von Neumann.GeroScience · 2025Review
- Neuritogenic glycosaminoglycan hydrogels promote functional recovery after severe traumatic brain injury.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Anti-Nogo-A Antibody Therapy Improves Functional Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2023Article
- Electrical stimulation methods and protocols for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: a critical review of preclinical research.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Review
- Machine-learning-based video analysis of grasping behavior during recovery from cervical spinal cord injury.Behavioural brain research · 2023Article
- Time course of recovery of different motor functions following a reproducible cortical infarction in non-human primates.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Restoring After Central Nervous System Injuries: Neural Mechanisms and Translational Applications of Motor Recovery.Neuroscience bulletin · 2022Review
- Improved Functional Outcome After Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Impaired Forelimb Post-stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Progress and challenges in preclinical stroke recovery research.Brain circulationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reach-to-grasp is an evolutionarily conserved motor function that is adversely impacted following stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, are promising tools that could enhance functional recovery of reach-to-grasp post-brain injury. Though the rodent literature provides a causal understanding of post-injury recovery mechanisms, it has had a limited impact on NIBS protocols in human research. The high degree of homology in reach-to-grasp circuitry between humans and rodents further implies that the application of NIBS to brain injury could be better informed by findings from pre-clinical rodent models and neurorehabilitation research. Here, we provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of using rodent models to advance our current understanding of human reach-to-grasp function, cortical circuitry, and reorganization. We propose that a cross-species comparison of reach-to-grasp recovery could provide a mechanistic framework for clinically efficacious NIBS treatments that could elicit better functional outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.