ArticleFrontiers in neurology2020
Computer Modeling of Clot Retrieval-Circle of Willis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complete anterior circle of Willis improves thrombectomy efficacy of balloon guide catheter for internal carotid artery occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- A multiscale computational framework to evaluate flow alterations during mechanical thrombectomy for treatment of ischaemic stroke.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Determining Clinically-Viable Biomarkers for Ischaemic Stroke Through a Mechanistic and Machine Learning Approach.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Flow dynamics in acute ischemic stroke due to embolic occlusion of a fetal posterior cerebral artery treated with endovascular thrombectomy - report of two cases.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
- Vascular tortuosity in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy.Brain circulationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endovascular clot retrieval, often referred to as mechanical thrombectomy, has transformed the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke based on an underlying large cerebral vessel occlusion, ranging from the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) to the M1 (proximal) segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a progressive occlusion of the extracranial portion of the ICA on the cerebral blood flow either with a conventional guiding catheter or a balloon-guiding catheter, which enables the operator to completely occlude the parent artery by inflating the balloon around the tip of this type of guiding catheter. We evaluated the impact of flow reduction in the ICA in the setting of ipsilateral MCA occlusion given the different configurations of the circle of Willis (CoW). The computer model of cerebral arteries was based on anatomical works by Rhoton (1) and van der Eecken (2). The interactive experimental results are available on the web at https://gntem3.shinyapps.io/ecrsim. In the setting of left MCA occlusion, compensation from the anterior and posterior communicating artery preserved the flow in the left anterior cerebral artery (ACA) but not the left MCA branches. Under selected CoW configurations, such as classic, missing Acom, or missing A1 segment of the ACA and concurrent right ICA occlusion, there was a progressive decrease of flow in the left ACA to a minimum of 78% when the simulated catheter fully occluded the left ICA. Flow collapsed (<10%) in the left ACA and MCA branches under CoW configurations, such as bilateral fetal PCA. In summary, compensatory flow collapsed under certain clot retrieval scenarios and unusual configurations of CoW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.