ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Center Bias Does Not Account for the Advantage of Meaning Over Salience in Attentional Guidance During Scene Viewing.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the contributions of top-down and bottom-up processing on eye movements during parallel visual search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Planning to be incremental: Scene descriptions reveal meaningful clustering in language production.Cognition · 2026Article
- Visual search for people wearing protective clothing in a forestial environment - Differences between gaze and behavior.PloS one · 2026Article
- Scanpath EEG dynamic, a new perspective for neuroaesthetic connoisseurship in paintings.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Retinal eccentricity modulates saliency-driven but not relevance-driven visual selection.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Objects are selected for attention based upon meaning during passive scene viewing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Searching for meaning: Local scene semantics guide attention during natural visual search in scenes.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- Reading in the city: mobile eye-tracking and evaluation of text in an everyday setting.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Speakers prioritise affordance-based object semantics in scene descriptions.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Rapid Extraction of the Spatial Distribution of Physical Saliency and Semantic Informativeness from Natural Scenes in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Meaning and expected surfaces combine to guide attention during visual search in scenes.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Salient objects dominate the central fixation bias when orienting toward images.Journal of vision · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies assessing the relationship between high-level meaning and low-level image salience on real-world attention have shown that meaning better predicts eye movements than image salience. However, it is not yet clear whether the advantage of meaning over salience is a general phenomenon or whether it is related to center bias: the tendency for viewers to fixate scene centers. Previous meaning mapping studies have shown meaning predicts eye movements beyond center bias whereas saliency does not. However, these past findings were correlational or
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.