Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849082›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Toward a Dimensional Assessment of Externalizing Disorders in Children: Reliability and Validity of a Semi-Structured Parent Interview.

Ann-Kathrin Thöne, Anja Görtz-Dorten, Paula Altenberger, Christina Dose, Nina Geldermann, Christopher Hautmann, Lea Teresa Jendreizik, Anne-Katrin Treier, Elena von Wirth, Tobias Banaschewski and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann-Kathrin ThöneSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anja Görtz-DortenSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Paula AltenbergerSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christina DoseSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nina GeldermannSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christopher HautmannSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lea Teresa JendreizikSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anne-Katrin TreierSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Elena von WirthSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tobias BanaschewskiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Daniel BrandeisDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Sabina MillenetDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Sarah HohmannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Katja BeckerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Johanna KetterDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Johannes HebebrandDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jasmin WenningDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Martin HoltmannLWL-University Hospital for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hamm, Germany.
Tanja LegenbauerLWL-University Hospital for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ruhr-University Bochum, Hamm, Germany.
Michael HussDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Marcel RomanosCenter of Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Thomas JansCenter of Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Julia GeisslerCenter of Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Luise PoustkaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Henrik Uebel-von SanderslebenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Tobias RennerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Ute DürrwächterDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Manfred DöpfnerSchool of Child and Adolescent Cognitive Behavior Therapy (AKiP), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DECentral Institute of Mental Health · DELWL-Universitätsklinik Hamm · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEBrain (Germany) · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DESwiss Integrative Center for Human Health · CHUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study assesses the reliability and validity of the DSM-5-based, semi-structured

methodParticipant data were drawn from the ongoing ESCAschool intervention study. The ILF-EXTERNAL was evaluated in a clinical sample of 474 children and adolescents (aged 6-12 years, 92 females) with symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). To obtain interrater reliability, the one-way random-effects, absolute agreement models of the intraclass correlation (ICC) for single ICC(1,1) and average measurements ICC(1,3) were computed between the interviewers and two independent raters for 45 randomly selected interviews involving ten interviewers. Overall agreement on DSM-5 diagnoses was assessed using Fleiss' kappa. Further analyses evaluated internal consistencies, item-total correlations as well as correlations between symptom severity and the degree of functional impairment. Additionally, parents completed the German version of the

resultsICC coefficients demonstrated very good to excellent interrater reliability on the item and scale level of the ILF-EXTERNAL [scale level: ICC(1,1) = 0.83-0.95; ICC(1,3) = 0.94-0.98]. Overall kappa agreement on DSM-5 diagnoses was substantial to almost perfect for most disorders (0.38 ≤ κ ≤ 0.94). With some exceptions, internal consistencies (0.60 ≤ α ≤ 0.86) and item-total correlations (0.21 ≤

conclusionIn clinically referred, school-age children, the ILF-EXTERNAL demonstrates sound psychometric properties. The ILF-EXTERNAL is a promising clinical interview and contributes to high-quality diagnostics of externalizing disorders in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

ADHDexternalizing disordersintraclass correlation coefficientODDreliabilitystructured interviewvalidity

Identifiers

PMID32849082
PMCPMC7396521
OpenAlexW3045139211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.