ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
The Importance of Cursive Handwriting Over Typewriting for Learning in the Classroom: A High-Density EEG Study of 12-Year-Old Children and Young Adults.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Writing as cognitive rehabilitation in MCI and dementia: a systematic review of therapeutic benefits and applications.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Trainee-delivered school-based intervention with guided narrative writing for adolescent anxiety and depression: a cluster randomized controlled trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Article
- Motor and cognitive determinants of L2 handwriting fluency and legibility in 10-12-year-old girls: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Human brain imaging with high-density electroencephalography: Techniques and applications.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing-Who Wins the Battle?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Orthographic character complexity modulates dynamic neural activity in skilled handwriting.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025Article
- Handwriting in primary school: comparing standardized tests and evaluating impact of grapho-motor parameters.Reading and writing · 2025Article
- Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Neuronal Gamma Oscillations During Occlusion Events in Infants.Developmental psychobiology · 2025Article
- Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of Writing Readiness Inventory Tool in Context (WRITIC).Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Relationship between Product and Process Characteristics of Handwriting Skills of Children in the Second Grade of Elementary School.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: a high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- How understanding and strengthening brain networks can contribute to elementary education.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Fine motor skills and motor control networking in developmental age.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022Article
- Protracted Neural Development of Dorsal Motor Systems During Handwriting and the Relation to Early Literacy Skills.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Effect of Handwriting on Visual Word Recognition in Chinese Bilingual Children and Adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Visuospatial and Sensorimotor Functions of Posterior Parietal Cortex in Drawing Tasks: A Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Curved vs. Straight-Line Handwriting Effects on Word Recognition in Typical and Dyslexic Readers Across Chinese and English.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Advantage of Handwriting Over Typing on Learning Words: Evidence From an N400 Event-Related Potential Index.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Toward Evaluation of the Subjective Experience of a General Class of User-Controlled, Robot-Mediated Rehabilitation Technologies for Children with Neuromotor Disability.Informatics (MDPI) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To write by hand, to type, or to draw - which of these strategies is the most efficient for optimal learning in the classroom? As digital devices are increasingly replacing traditional writing by hand, it is crucial to examine the long-term implications of this practice. High-density electroencephalogram (HD EEG) was used in 12 young adults and 12, 12-year-old children to study brain electrical activity as they were writing in cursive by hand, typewriting, or drawing visually presented words that were varying in difficulty. Analyses of temporal spectral evolution (TSE, i.e., time-dependent amplitude changes) were performed on EEG data recorded with a 256-channel sensor array. For young adults, we found that when writing by hand using a digital pen on a touchscreen, brain areas in the parietal and central regions showed event-related synchronized activity in the theta range. Existing literature suggests that such oscillatory neuronal activity in these particular brain areas is important for memory and for the encoding of new information and, therefore, provides the brain with optimal conditions for learning. When drawing, we found similar activation patterns in the parietal areas, in addition to event-related desynchronization in the alpha/beta range, suggesting both similarities but also slight differences in activation patterns when drawing and writing by hand. When typewriting on a keyboard, we found event-related desynchronized activity in the theta range and, to a lesser extent, in the alpha range in parietal and central brain regions. However, as this activity was desynchronized and differed from when writing by hand and drawing, its relation to learning remains unclear. For 12-year-old children, the same activation patterns were found, but to a lesser extent. We suggest that children, from an early age, must be exposed to handwriting and drawing activities in school to establish the neuronal oscillation patterns that are beneficial for learning. We conclude that because of the benefits of sensory-motor integration due to the larger involvement of the senses as well as fine and precisely controlled hand movements when writing by hand and when drawing, it is vital to maintain both activities in a learning environment to facilitate and optimize learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.