Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32849024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Time-Dependent Negative Effects of Verbal and Non-verbal Suggestions in Surgical Patients-A Study on Arm Muscle Strength.

Nina Zech, Matthias Schrödinger, Milena Seemann, Florian Zeman, Timo F Seyfried, Ernil Hansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Communication in the ICU: An Unintended Nocebo Effect?Journal of patient experience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Are there placebo or nocebo effects in balancing performance?Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hypnosis at the Crossroads: A Primer of the Past and Visions for the Future.The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina ZechDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Matthias SchrödingerDepartment of Internal Medicine, District Hospital Wörth an der Donau, Wörth am Rhein, Germany.
Milena SeemannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian ZemanCentre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Timo F SeyfriedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Ernil HansenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEAgaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe medical environment is full of suggestions that affect patients and their healing. Most of them inadvertently are negative, thus evoking nocebo effects. Recently, we have reported on the effect of such verbal and non-verbal suggestions as well as alternative formulations on maximal muscular arm strength in healthy volunteers. In the present study, we tested the same suggestions in patients at two time points to evaluate nocebo effects in a clinical situation and the impact of the approaching surgery date.

methodsIn 45 patients, maximal muscular strength during arm abduction was measured by dynamometry of the deltoid muscle group. One test was several days before and the second on the evening before surgery. Baseline values were compared to the performance after exposure to 18 verbal and non-verbal suggestions. The sequence of presumably negative and positive suggestions was randomized for each patient in order to avoid cumulation effects of immediate succession of two negatives. State anxiety was evaluated at both time points, and suggestibility was measured after surgery.

resultsStrong and statistically significant weakening effects were observed with all presumed negative suggestions from daily clinical practice including words of encouragement (91.4% of baseline), evaluation of symptoms (89.0%), announcement of a medical intervention (82.8%), a negative memory (86.5%), expectation of an uncertain future (82.8%), and non-verbal signals (87.7-92.2%). In contrast, alternative formulations did not interfere with muscular performance in most cases. A more pronounced effect was observed in the test repeated closer to the date of surgery, accompanied by a 15% higher anxiety level. The increase in anxiety correlated slightly with stronger weakening effects of suggestions, as did suggestibility.

conclusionsNegative suggestions cause a decrease in arm muscle strength, i.e., a "weakening" of the patient. This effect is enhanced by an increase in anxiety as the time of treatment, like surgery, approaches. The reaction can be avoided by alternative formulations. These nocebo effects that are objectively measured and quantified by a decrease in arm muscle strength are more pronounced in patients, i.e., in a clinical situation, than in healthy volunteers.

Indexed as

dynamometrymaximal muscle strengthnocebo effectsState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)suggestionstherapeutic communication

Identifiers

PMID32849024
PMCPMC7399336
OpenAlexW3038636917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.