ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
TacticUP Video Test for Soccer: Development and Validation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of professional football players' sprint performance efficiency in matches.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Effects of Developmental Activities and Interventions on Decision-Making Skills in Soccer Players: A Scoping Review.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
- The Mental Fatigue Induced by Physical, Cognitive and Combined Effort in Amateur Soccer Players: A Comparative Study Using EEG.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Visualization of the Research Panorama of Decision-Making in Soccer: Bibliometric Analysis with VOSviewer and Review of the Most Cited Studies of the Last 15 Years (2010-2024).Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Questioning the validity and reliability of using a video-based test to assess decision making among female and male water polo players.International journal of sports science & coaching · 2024Article
- The role of offensive processes and age development for female soccer players' anticipation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Design and Validation of a Test to Evaluate the Execution Time and Decision-Making in Technical-Tactical Football Actions (Passing and Driving).Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Better decision-making skills support tactical behaviour and reduce physical wear under physical fatigue in soccer.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- A Video-Based Tactical Task Does Not Elicit Mental Fatigue and Does Not Impair Soccer Performance in a Subsequent Small-Sided Game.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Adaptation and Validation of a Test for the Evaluation of Tactical Knowledge in Soccer: Test de Conocimiento Táctico Ofensivo en Fútbol for the Brazilian Context (TCTOF-BRA).Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Nature Scenes Counter Mental Fatigue-Induced Performance Decrements in Soccer Decision-Making.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to expand the process of tactical assessment of soccer players through the development and validation of a video-based test based on core tactical principles of play. The TacticUP video test for soccer is composed of offensive and defensive video sequences of 11vs11 soccer situations. Participants should choose the most appropriate solution for each video sequence. Content validity was established based on a panel of nine experts from four different countries. Construct validity was assessed through the comparison between players with distinct expertise levels. Comparisons between groups' final scores showed statistical differences (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.