ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020
Methodological Biases in CBT Trial-Commentary: Modular Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Affective Symptoms in Young Individuals at Ultra-High Risk of First Episode of Psychosis: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis who do not transition to psychosis: a meta-analysis.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Overoptimistic Literature and Methodological Biases Favoring Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Prevention of Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Article
- Mapping the implementation and challenges of clinical services for psychosis prevention in England.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Lack of robust meta-analytic evidence to favour cognitive behavioural therapy for prevention of psychosis.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.