Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848882›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2020

Pulmonary Vascular Disease and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.

Pierantonio Laveneziana, Jason Weatherald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Physical exercise for pulmonary arterial hypertension diagnosis and therapy.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Identifying limitations to exercise with incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in interstitial lung diseases and the value of ventilatory efficiency.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierantonio LavenezianaSorbonne Université, INSERM, UMR S1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France.
Jason WeatheraldDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is of great interest and utility for clinicians dealing Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) in several ways, including: helping with differential diagnosis, evaluating exercise intolerance and its underpinning mechanisms, accurately assessing exertional dyspnea and unmasking its underlying often non-straightforward mechanisms, generating prognostic indicators. Pathophysiologic anomalies in PH can range from reduced cardiac output and aerobic capacity, to inefficient ventilation, dyspnea, dynamic hyperinflation, and locomotor muscle dysfunction. CPET can magnify the PH-related pathophysiologic anomalies and has a major role in the management of PH patients.

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary exercise testingdynamic hyperinflationdyspneaprognosispulmonary hypertensionventilatory inefficiency

Identifiers

PMID32848882
PMCPMC7425313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.