Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848837›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Cardiopulmonary Resonance Function and Indices-A Quantitative Measurement for Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia.

Jiajia Cui, Zhipei Huang, Jiankang Wu, Hong Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiajia CuiSensor Networks and Application Research Center, School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhipei HuangSensor Networks and Application Research Center, School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiankang WuSensor Networks and Application Research Center, School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hong JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) represents a physiological phenomenon of cardiopulmonary interaction. It is known as a measure of efficiency of the circulation system, as well as a biomarker of cardiac vagal and well-being. In this article, RSA is modeled as modulation of heart rate by respiration in an interactive cardiopulmonary system with the most effective system state of resonance. By mathematically modeling of this modulation, we propose a quantitative measurement for RSA referred to as "Cardiopulmonary Resonance Function (CRF) and Cardiopulmonary Resonance Indices (CRI)," which are derived by disentanglement of the RR-intervals series into respiratory-modulation component, R-HRV, and the rest, NR-HRV using spectral G-causality. Evaluation of CRI performance in quantifying RSA has been conducted in the scenarios of paced breathing and in the different sleep stages. The preliminary experimental results have shown superior representation ability of CRF and CRI compared to Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and Cardiopulmonary Coupling index (CPC).

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary interactioncoupled resonanceheart rate variabilityrespiratory sinus arrhythmiaspectral G-causality

Identifiers

PMID32848837
PMCPMC7419684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.