Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848834›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Strategies to Enhance Logic Modeling-Based Cell Line-Specific Drug Synergy Prediction.

Barbara Niederdorfer, Vasundra Touré, Miguel Vazquez, Liv Thommesen, Martin Kuiper, Astrid Lægreid, Åsmund Flobak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara NiederdorferDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Vasundra TouréDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Miguel VazquezDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Liv ThommesenDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Martin KuiperDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Astrid LægreidDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Åsmund FlobakDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOBarcelona Supercomputing Center · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrete dynamical modeling shows promise in prioritizing drug combinations for screening efforts by reducing the experimental workload inherent to the vast numbers of possible drug combinations. We have investigated approaches to predict combination responses across different cancer cell lines using logic models generated from one generic prior-knowledge network representing 144 nodes covering major cancer signaling pathways. Cell-line specific models were configured to agree with baseline activity data from each unperturbed cell line. Testing against experimental data demonstrated a high number of true positive and true negative predictions, including also cell-specific responses. We demonstrate the possible enhancement of predictive capability of models by curation of literature knowledge further detailing subtle biologically founded signaling mechanisms in the model topology.

Indexed as

cell signaling networkdrug combinationhigh-influence nodeslogic modelingsynergy prediction

Identifiers

PMID32848834
PMCPMC7399174
OpenAlexW3046079892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.