ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020
Serious Adverse Drug Reactions and Safety Signals in Children: A Nationwide Database Study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring pediatricians' off-label prescribing behavior in China: A theory of planned behavior-based study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of reported serious adverse drug reactions due to anti-infectives using nationwide database of Thailand.PloS one · 2025Article
- Digital monitoring of medication safety in children: an investigation of ADR signalling techniques in Malaysia.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Use of antimicrobials in pediatric wards of five Brazilian hospitals.BMC pediatrics · 2024Observational
- Identification of Novel Signals Associated with US-FDA Approved Drugs (2013) Using Disproportionality Analysis.Current drug safety · 2024Article
- Potential safety signals for antibacterial agents from the Brazilian national pharmacovigilance database (Vigimed/VigiFlow).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Causality and avoidability of adverse drug reactions of antibiotics in hospitalized children: a cohort study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Translation, transcultural adaptation and validation to Brazilian Portuguese of tools for adverse drug reaction assessment in children.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Data Sources for Drug Utilization Research in Brazil-DUR-BRA Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Cancer Patients in China: An Analysis of Henan Province Spontaneous Reporting System Database.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children are more exposed to inappropriate medicine use and its consequent harms. Spontaneous reporting of suspected Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (SADR) increases knowledge and prevention of pharmacotherapy risk. Disproportionality measures are useful to quantify unexpected safety issues associated with a given drug-event pair (signals of disproportionality). This cross-sectional study aimed to assess SADR reporting and safety signals for Brazilian children from 0-12 years old, notified between January 2008 and December 2013 from the Brazilian Surveillance Agency (Notivisa). Information from serious reports (gender and age of the patient, event description, suspected drug) was included. Disproportionality analysis based on Reporting Odds Ratios with a confidence interval of 95% was conducted to identify possible signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR). Almost 30% of 1,977 suspected SADR was related to babies (0-1-year-old). 69% of reports happened with intravenous dosage forms, and 35% of suspected SADR involved off label use according to age. Laronidase, miglustat, imipenem/cilastatin, and clofarabine were involved in six or more suspected deaths among 75 deaths reported. There were 107 SDRs, of which 16 events (15%) were not described in the product labels. There was a relatively higher number of SADRs in Brazilian children compared with studies from other countries. SDRs found, (especially drug-event pairs 'imipenen/cilastatin-pneumonia' and 'laronidase-respiratory insufficiency') should be investigated more. The reports of SADR with IV dosage forms and OL drug use suggest the need for drug research and the use of better dosage forms for children in Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.