Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848684›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2020

The Neuroscience of Spatial Navigation and the Relationship to Artificial Intelligence.

Edgar Bermudez-Contreras, Benjamin J Clark, Aaron Wilber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Hippocampal-Parietal Network for Reference Frame Coordination.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Artificial intelligence insights into hippocampal processing.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edgar Bermudez-ContrerasCanadian Centre for Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Benjamin J ClarkDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Aaron WilberDepartment of Psychology, Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.

Funding

Parietal-hippocampal network in the triple transgenic mouse model of AlzheimersR00AG049090 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILBER, AARON A · 2017 to 2019
$747k
Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Neural Representations of SpaceR21AA024983 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI CLARK, BENJAMIN J, HAMILTON, DEREK A. · 2017 to 2018
$398k
Parietal-hippocampal network in the triple transgenic mouse model of AlzheimersK99AG049090 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WILBER, AARON A · 2015 to 2016
$189k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA024983NIA NIH HHS K99 AG049090NIA NIH HHS R00 AG049090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and neuroscience are impressive. In AI, this includes the development of computer programs that can beat a grandmaster at GO or outperform human radiologists at cancer detection. A great deal of these technological developments are directly related to progress in artificial neural networks-initially inspired by our knowledge about how the brain carries out computation. In parallel, neuroscience has also experienced significant advances in understanding the brain. For example, in the field of spatial navigation, knowledge about the mechanisms and brain regions involved in neural computations of cognitive maps-an internal representation of space-recently received the Nobel Prize in medicine. Much of the recent progress in neuroscience has partly been due to the development of technology used to record from very large populations of neurons in multiple regions of the brain with exquisite temporal and spatial resolution in behaving animals. With the advent of the vast quantities of data that these techniques allow us to collect there has been an increased interest in the intersection between AI and neuroscience, many of these intersections involve using AI as a novel tool to explore and analyze these large data sets. However, given the common initial motivation point-to understand the brain-these disciplines could be more strongly linked. Currently much of this potential synergy is not being realized. We propose that spatial navigation is an excellent area in which these two disciplines can converge to help advance what we know about the brain. In this review, we first summarize progress in the neuroscience of spatial navigation and reinforcement learning. We then turn our attention to discuss how spatial navigation has been modeled using descriptive, mechanistic, and normative approaches and the use of AI in such models. Next, we discuss how AI can advance neuroscience, how neuroscience can advance AI, and the limitations of these approaches. We finally conclude by highlighting promising lines of research in which spatial navigation can be the point of intersection between neuroscience and AI and how this can contribute to the advancement of the understanding of intelligent behavior.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learninglearningmemoryneurosciencereinforcement learningspatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID32848684
PMCPMC7399088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.