Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848659›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

Response Activation and Inhibition in Patients With Prolactinomas: An Electrophysiological Study.

Jian Song, Chenglong Cao, Yu Wang, Shun Yao, Michael P Catalino, Deqi Yan, Guozheng Xu, Lianting Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuropsychological complications of hypoprolactinemia.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  5. Cognition and psychological wellbeing in hypopituitary patients.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jian SongDepartment of Neurosurgery, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Central Theater Command, Wuhan, China.
Chenglong CaoThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu WangKey Laboratory of Cognitive Science, College of Biomedical Engineering, South- Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China.
Shun YaoCenter for Pituitary Tumor Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Michael P CatalinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Deqi YanTraditional Chinese Medicine College, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Guozheng XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Central Theater Command, Wuhan, China.
Lianting MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Central Theater Command, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairment of executive function has been reported in patients with prolactinomas. However, few studies have investigated the electrophysiological mechanisms of response activation and response inhibition in these patients. In this study, we employ an event-related potentials (ERPs) technique to quantitatively assess response activation and inhibition before and after the surgical treatment of prolactinomas. A 64-electrode electroencephalogram (EEG) skullcap was used to record the brain activity in 20 pre-operative patients, 20 follow-up post-operative patients, and 20 healthy controls (HCs) while performing the visual Go/Nogo task. As expected, we identified P300 across all study populations that could reflect response activation and inhibition. Across the three groups, the Nogo stimuli evoked larger frontal-central P300 than the Go stimuli did. In contrast, the Go trials elicited larger parietal P300 than the Nogo trials did. The peak latency of P300 was significantly delayed in both the pre-operative and the post-operative groups compared to the HCs. The amplitude of P300 in both the Go and the Nogo conditions was significantly decreased in the pre-operative patients compared with that of the HCs. At 6 months post-operatively, the prolactinoma patients showed an increase in amplitude of P300 during both the Go and the Nogo tasks. These findings indicate that the prolactinoma patients suffer from deficits in response activation and inhibition, which could be improved by surgical treatment.

Indexed as

ERPsP300prolactinomaresponse activationresponse inhibition

Identifiers

PMID32848659
PMCPMC7396600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.