Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848488›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2020

Probable Longer Incubation Period for Elderly COVID-19 Cases: Analysis of 180 Contact Tracing Data in Hubei Province, China.

Jingyi Dai, Lin Yang, Jun Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A Review of the Current Status of Clinical Management of COVID-19 in the Elderly.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jingyi DaiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Third People's Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, Yunnan Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9210-8902
Lin YangSchool of Public Health and Management, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhaoSchool of Public Health and Management, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-311X
Hubei University of Medicine · CNKunming Third People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFactors associated with the incubation period of COVID-19 are not fully known. The aim of this study was to estimate the incubation period of COVID-19 using epidemiological contact tracing data, and to explore whether there were different incubation periods among different age gr1oups.

methodsWe collected contact tracing data in a municipality in Hubei province during the full outbreak period of COVID-19. The exposure periods were inferred from the history of travel in Wuhan and/or history of exposure to confirmed cases. The incubation periods were estimated using parametric accelerated failure time models accounting for interval censoring of exposures.

resultsThe incubation period of COVID-19 follows a Weibull distribution and has a median of 5.8 days with a bootstrap 95% CI: 5.4-6.7 days. Of the symptomatic cases, 95% showed symptoms by 14.3 days (95% CI: 13.0-15.7), and 99% showed symptoms by 18.7 days (95% CI: 16.7-20.9). The incubation periods were not found significantly different between male and female. Elderly cases had significant longer incubation periods than young age cases (HR 1.49 with 95% CI: 1.09-2.05). The median incubation period was estimated at 4.0 days (95% CI: 3.5-4.4) for cases aged under 30, 5.8 days (95% CI: 5.6-6.0) for cases aged between 30 and 59, and 7.7 days (95% CI: 6.9-8.4) for cases aged greater than or equal to 60.

conclusionThe current practice of a 14-day quarantine period in many regions is reasonable for any age. Older people infected with SARS-CoV2 have longer incubation period than that of younger people. Thus, more attention should be paid to asymptomatic elderly people who had a history of exposure.

Indexed as

coronavirusepidemiologyincubation periodinfectious disease

Identifiers

PMID32848488
PMCPMC7429221
OpenAlexW3048438300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.