Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848354›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2020

Treatment Updates for Neuromuscular Channelopathies.

Nantaporn Jitpimolmard, Emma Matthews, Doreen Fialho

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment updates in myotonic disorders.Journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy of a KMuscle & nerve · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Periodic paralysis.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2024
    Review
  8. Muscle channelopathies: A review.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Blockers of Skeletal Muscle NaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nantaporn JitpimolmardQueen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
Emma MatthewsQueen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.
Doreen FialhoQueen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7161-6185
Khon Kaen University · THNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209583/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis article aims to review the current and upcoming treatment options of primary muscle channelopathies including the non-dystrophic myotonias and periodic paralyses. RECENT

findingsThe efficacy of mexiletine in the treatment of myotonia is now supported by two randomised placebo-controlled trials, one of which utilised a novel aggregated n-of-1 design. This has resulted in licencing of the drug via orphan drug status. There is also good evidence that mexiletine is well tolerated and safe in this patient group without the need for intensive monitoring. A range of alternative antimyotonic treatment options include lamotrigine, carbamazepine and ranolazine exist with variable evidence base. In vitro studies have shown insight into reasons for treatment failure of some medications with certain genotypes opening the era of mutation-specific therapy such as use of flecainide. In the periodic paralyses, the ability of MRI to distinguish between reversible oedema and irreversible fatty replacement makes it an increasingly useful tool to guide and assess pharmacological treatment. Unfortunately, the striking efficacy of bumetanide in hypokalaemic periodic paralysis animal models was not replicated in a recent pilot study in humans. SUMMARY: The treatment of skeletal muscle channelopathies combines dietary and lifestyle advice together with pharmacological interventions. The rarity of these conditions remains a barrier for clinical studies but the example of the aggregated n-of-1 trial of mexiletine shows that innovative trial design can overcome these hurdles. Further research is required to test efficacy of drugs shown to have promising characteristics in preclinical experiments such as safinamide, riluzule and magnesium for myotonia or bumetanide for hypokalaemic periodic paralysis.

Indexed as

Andersen-Tawil syndromeChannelopathyMyotonia congenitaParamyotonia congenitaPeriodic paralysisSodium channel myotonia

Identifiers

PMID32848354
PMCPMC7443183
OpenAlexW3080107933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.