Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848330›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer: Current controversies and future directions.

Fernando López-Campos, Margarita Martín-Martín, Roberto Fornell-Pérez, Juan Carlos García-Pérez, Javier Die-Trill, Raquel Fuentes-Mateos, Sergio López-Durán, José Domínguez-Rullán, Reyes Ferreiro, Alejandro Riquelme-Oliveira and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06589388 (ctDNA Monitoring to Predict the Efficacy of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06589388 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

ctDNA Monitoring to Predict the Efficacy of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorGene SolutionsRan2024 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsRectal Cancer, Rectal Cancer Stage II, Rectal Cancer Stage III
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dealing with rectum motion during radiotherapy: How can we anticipate it?Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fernando López-CamposDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Margarita Martín-MartínDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Roberto Fornell-PérezDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao 48013, Vizcaya, Spain.
Juan Carlos García-PérezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Javier Die-TrillDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Raquel Fuentes-MateosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Sergio López-DuránDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
José Domínguez-RullánDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Reyes FerreiroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Alejandro Riquelme-OliveiraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Madrid 28034, Spain.
Asunción Hervás-MorónDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain. hervasmoron@gmail.com.
Felipe CouñagoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid 28003, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the main international clinical guidelines, the recommended treatment for locally-advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. However, doubts have been raised about the appropriate definition of clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and the role of surgery in patients who achieve a cCR. Surgical resection is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life (QoL), which is especially relevant given the favourable prognosis in this patient subset. Accordingly, there has been a growing interest in alternative approaches with less morbidity, including the organ-preserving watch and wait strategy, in which surgery is omitted in patients who have achieved a cCR. These patients are managed with a specific follow-up protocol to ensure adequate cancer control, including the early identification of recurrent disease. However, there are several open questions about this strategy, including patient selection, the clinical and radiological criteria to accurately determine cCR, the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, the role of dose intensification (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), optimal follow-up protocols, and the future perspectives of this approach. In the present review, we summarize the available evidence on the watch and wait strategy in this clinical scenario, including ongoing clinical trials, QoL in these patients, and the controversies surrounding this treatment approach.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTreatment OutcomeWatchful WaitingClinical complete responseDose intensificationOrgan preservationRectal cancerWatch and wait

Identifiers

PMID32848330
PMCPMC7422545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.