Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848328›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Impact of mobile health and medical applications on clinical practice in gastroenterology.

Sven Kernebeck, Theresa S Busse, Maximilian D Böttcher, Jürgen Weitz, Jan Ehlers, Ulrich Bork

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sven KernebeckDidactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten 58455, Germany.
Theresa S BusseDidactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten 58455, Germany.
Maximilian D BöttcherDepartment of GI-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Dresden Technical University, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany.
Jürgen WeitzDepartment of GI-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Dresden Technical University, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany.
Jan EhlersDidactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten 58455, Germany.
Ulrich BorkDepartment of GI-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Dresden Technical University, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany. ulrich.bork@uniklinikum-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile health apps (MHAs) and medical apps (MAs) are becoming increasingly popular as digital interventions in a wide range of health-related applications in almost all sectors of healthcare. The surge in demand for digital medical solutions has been accelerated by the need for new diagnostic and therapeutic methods in the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This also applies to clinical practice in gastroenterology, which has, in many respects, undergone a recent digital transformation with numerous consequences that will impact patients and health care professionals in the near future. MHAs and MAs are considered to have great potential, especially for chronic diseases, as they can support the self-management of patients in many ways. Despite the great potential associated with the application of MHAs and MAs in gastroenterology and health care in general, there are numerous challenges to be met in the future, including both the ethical and legal aspects of applying this technology. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current status of MHA and MA use in the field of gastroenterology, describe the future perspectives in this field and point out some of the challenges that need to be addressed.

Indexed as

GastroenterologyMobile ApplicationsSelf-ManagementTelemedicineWearable Electronic DevicesComputer LiteracyComputer SecurityDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsEthics, MedicalHealth BehaviorHumansPatient Education as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsSmartphoneDigital biomarkereHealthElectronic health recordsHealth applicationsMedical applicationsmHealthMobile applicationsMobile healthSmartphoneTechnologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32848328
PMCPMC7422538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.