Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848280›Full record

ArticlePlant and soil2020

A comparison between water uptake and root length density in winter wheat: effects of root density and rhizosphere properties.

X X Zhang, P A Whalley, R W Ashton, J Evans, M J Hawkesford, S Griffiths, Z D Huang, H Zhou, S J Mooney, W R Whalley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant and soil, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of soil moisture onFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

X X ZhangRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
P A WhalleyUniversity of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory, Andrew Wiles Building, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.
R W AshtonRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
J EvansRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
M J HawkesfordRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
S GriffithsJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH UK.
Z D HuangFarmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang, 453002 Henan China.
H ZhouSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD UK.
S J MooneySchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD UK.
W R WhalleyRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
Rothamsted Research · GBFarmland Irrigation Research Institute · CNJohn Innes Centre · GBLoughborough University · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsWe aim to quantify the variation in root distribution in a set of 35 experimental wheat lines. We also compared the effect of variation in hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere on water uptake by roots.

methodsWe measured the root length density and soil drying in 35 wheat lines in a field experiment. A 3D numerical model was used to predict soil drying profiles with the different root length distributions and compared with measured soil drying. The model was used to test different scenarios of the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere.

resultsWe showed that wheat lines with no detectable differences in root length density can induce soil drying profiles with statistically significant differences. Our data confirmed that a root length density of at least 1 cm/cm

conclusionIn a set of wheat lines with no detectable differences in the root length density we found significant differences in water uptake. This may be because small differences in root density at depth can result in larger differences in water uptake or that the hydraulic properties of the rhizosphere can greatly affect water uptake.

Indexed as

PhenotypingRoot length distributionSimulationSoil water profile

Identifiers

PMID32848280
PMCPMC7437669
OpenAlexW3022385168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.