Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848221›Full record

ReviewNature2020

Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour.

Ovijit Chaudhuri, Justin Cooper-White, Paul A Janmey, David J Mooney, Vivek B Shenoy

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,042 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,042citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
110.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,042 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2,081 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Biomaterials and biosystems · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Understanding and targeting the tumour matrisome.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Decoding Cytoskeletal Mechanobiology with Tunable Microenvironments.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026
    Article
  17. Prepatterned Tissue Stiffness Gradient Controls Organ shape and size.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

982 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ovijit ChaudhuriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. chaudhuri@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-3401
Justin Cooper-WhiteSchool of Chemical Engineering and Australian Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. j.cooperwhite@uq.edu.au.
Paul A JanmeyInstitute for Medicine and Engineering, Center for Engineering Mechanobiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. janmey@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
David J MooneySchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Wyss Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. mooneyd@seas.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6299-1194
Vivek B ShenoyCenter for Engineering Mechanobiology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. vshenoy@seas.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USHarvard University · USStanford University · USThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

PSOC@Penn Education and OutreachU54CA193417 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DISCHER, DENNIS E. · 2015 to 2020
$10.5M
Pathological consequences of altered tissue mechanics in fibrosisR01EB017753 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JANMEY, PAUL A, SHENOY, VIVEK · 2014 to 2025
$6.3M
Research Supplement - Quantitative analyses of tumor cell extravasationU01CA202177 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KAMM, ROGER D · 2015 to 2020
$4.2M
Regulation of cell, tissue, and nucleus function by mechanical properties of biopolymer networksR35GM136259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Paul A Janmey · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
An integrated approach to melanoma metastasis and therapy resistance: effects of age-related changes in the ECM and the biomechanics of the skinR01CA232256 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI CUKIERMAN, EDNA, RAJ, ARJUN · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
POLYMERIC MATRICES WITH DEFINED CELL ADHESION AND MECHANR01DE013033 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MOONEY, DAVID J · 1998 to 2018
$3.0M
3D Models of ImmunotherapyU01CA214369 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HODI, FRANK S, LEWIS, JENNIFER A. · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Role of extracellular matrix malleability in mediating breast cancer cell invasion and migrationR37CA214136 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHAUDHURI, OVIJIT · 2018 to 2024
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA232256NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214136NCI NIH HHS U01 CA202177NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214369NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193417NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017753NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013033NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136259NIH HHS EB017753NIH HHS GM136259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial research over the past two decades has established that extracellular matrix (ECM) elasticity, or stiffness, affects fundamental cellular processes, including spreading, growth, proliferation, migration, differentiation and organoid formation. Linearly elastic polyacrylamide hydrogels and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomers coated with ECM proteins are widely used to assess the role of stiffness, and results from such experiments are often assumed to reproduce the effect of the mechanical environment experienced by cells in vivo. However, tissues and ECMs are not linearly elastic materials-they exhibit far more complex mechanical behaviours, including viscoelasticity (a time-dependent response to loading or deformation), as well as mechanical plasticity and nonlinear elasticity. Here we review the complex mechanical behaviours of tissues and ECMs, discuss the effect of ECM viscoelasticity on cells, and describe the potential use of viscoelastic biomaterials in regenerative medicine. Recent work has revealed that matrix viscoelasticity regulates these same fundamental cell processes, and can promote behaviours that are not observed with elastic hydrogels in both two- and three-dimensional culture microenvironments. These findings have provided insights into cell-matrix interactions and how these interactions differentially modulate mechano-sensitive molecular pathways in cells. Moreover, these results suggest design guidelines for the next generation of biomaterials, with the goal of matching tissue and ECM mechanics for in vitro tissue models and applications in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

ElasticityViscoelastic SubstancesBiocompatible MaterialsCell Culture TechniquesCell ShapeExtracellular MatrixHumansMechanotransduction, CellularMesenchymal Stem CellsModels, BiologicalRegenerative MedicineBiocompatible MaterialsViscoelastic Substances

Identifiers

PMID32848221
PMCPMC7676152
OpenAlexW3080362910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.