Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848197›Full record

ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2021

Pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: current level of knowledge among Flemish physicians and pharmacists.

Ahmed Edris, Anna Vanoverschelde, Pranvera Bushaj, Filip Van Nieuwerburgh, Lies Lahousse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unravelling the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in Belgium.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed EdrisDepartment of Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-5402
Anna VanoverscheldeDepartment of Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-917X
Pranvera BushajDepartment of Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Filip Van NieuwerburghLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8815-5485
Lies LahousseDepartment of Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. lies.lahousse@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-4363
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, pharmacogenetics (PGx) became an essential tool for personalized medicine although its clinical implementation is still limited. We aimed to assess the current level of knowledge, applications, and expectations of Flemish pharmacists and physicians towards PGx and determine the factors that influence healthcare professionals' knowledge of PGx, aiming to guide future implementation initiatives. A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from 8 March 2019 to 8 April 2019, targeting pharmacists, physicians, and trainees of both professions. Ten questions were used to assess the participants' knowledge about PGx. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the association of profession, experience, practice setting, and prior education with the level of PGx knowledge. In total, 201 Flemish healthcare providers participated, including 100 pharmacists, 73 physicians, and 28 trainees. The majority (78%) of participants were unfamiliar with the basic principles of PGx and its application in clinical practice. The mean percentage of correct answers achieved for the knowledge assessment questions was 34%. Only 9% had counseled patients, while 8% assisted other healthcare professionals on PGx tests the past year. Participants' PGx knowledge was significantly affected by their profession, practice setting, and level of prior education independent of years of experience. These findings provide insight into factors affecting the knowledge of PGx and the current level of PGx implementation in Flemish clinical practice. This may form a basis for developing educational initiatives to enhance the clinical application of PGx in Flanders.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePharmacistsPharmacogeneticsPhysiciansPrecision MedicineSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32848197
OpenAlexW3080146264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.