ArticleScientific reports2020
Incorporation of lateral microfiltration with immunoaffinity for enhancing the capture efficiency of rare cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microscale solid-phase extraction: advances in sorbent formats, system design, integration, and detection methods.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Highly Efficient Capture of Sarcoma Cells in Microfluidic Devices.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- [The concept of the liquid biopsy in the treatment of malignant eye tumours].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Review
- Dielectrophoretic capture and electrochemical enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of single melanoma cells at an array of interlocked spiral bipolar electrodes.ChemElectroChem · 2024Article
- Novel Isolating Approaches to Circulating Tumor Cell Enrichment Based on Microfluidics: A Review.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Liquid biopsy techniques and pancreatic cancer: diagnosis, monitoring, and evaluation.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- A Micropillar Array Based Microfluidic Device for Rare Cell Detection and Single-Cell Proteomics.Methods and protocols · 2023Article
- Microfluidics-Enabled Isolation and Single-Cell Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Review
- Longitudinal Study of Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Clinical applications of circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- From Exosomes to Circulating Tumor Cells: Using Microfluidics to Detect High Predictive Cancer Biomarkers.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- System Modularity Chip for Analysis of Rare Targets (SMART-Chip): Liquid Biopsy Samples.ACS sensors · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The methods for isolating rare cells such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be generally classified into two categories: those based on physical properties (e.g., size) and methods based on biological properties (e.g., immunoaffinity). CellSearch, the only FDA-approved method for the CTC-based cancer prognosis, relies on immunoaffinity interactions between CTCs and antibodies immobilized on magnetic particles. Immunoaffinity-based CTC isolation has also been employed in microfluidic devices, which show higher capture efficiency than CellSearch. We report here our investigation of combining size-based microfiltration into a microfluidic device with immunoaffinity for enhanced capture efficiency of CTCs. The device consists of four serpentine main channels, and each channel contains an array of lateral filters that create a two-dimensional flow. The main flow is through the serpentine channel, allowing the majority of the sample to pass by while the secondary flow goes through the lateral filters. The device design is optimized to make all fluid particles interact with filters. The filter sizes range from 24 to 12 µm, being slightly larger than or having similar dimension of CTCs. These filters are immobilized with antibodies specific to CTCs and thus they function as gates, allowing normal blood cells to pass by while forcing the interactions between CTCs and antibodies on the filter surfaces. The hydrodynamic force experienced by a CTC was also studied for optimal experimental conditions to ensure immunoaffinity-enabled cell capture. The device was evaluated by capturing two types of tumor cells spiked in healthy blood or a buffer, and we found that their capture efficiency was between 87.2 and 93.5%. The platform was further validated by isolating CTCs from blood samples of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.