Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848155›Full record

ReviewNature communications2020

Steps towards standardized quantification of adult neurogenesis.

Xinyu Zhao, Henriette van Praag

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinyu ZhaoWaisman Center and University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. xinyu.zhao@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5128-4424
Henriette van PraagBrain Institute and Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter, FL, 33458, USA. hvanpraag@health.fau.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5727-434X

Funding

Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center Down Syndrome RegistryU54HD090256 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MESSING, ALBEE · 2016 to 2020
$6.0M
The Role of MDM2 in FMRP regulation of neuronal developmentR01MH116582 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ZHAO, XINYU · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
The role of RNA binding protein in FXR1P in interneuronsR01MH118827 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ZHAO, XINYU · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
Integration of Experience-Induced Gene Expression and Circuit FunctionsR01NS105200 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JACKSON, MEYER B., ZHAO, XINYU · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
Circuit Activity and Synaptic Integration of Newborn Neurons in the Dentate GyrusR21NS098767 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JACKSON, MEYER B., ZHAO, XINYU · 2017 to 2018
$408k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090256NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116582NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118827NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105200NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS098767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New neurons are generated in adult mammals. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is considered to play an important role in cognition and mental health. The number and properties of newly born neurons are regulatable by a broad range of physiological and pathological conditions. To begin to understand the underlying cellular mechanisms and functional relevance of adult neurogenesis, many studies rely on quantification of adult-born neurons. However, lack of standardized methods to quantify new neurons is impeding research reproducibility across laboratories. Here, we review the importance of stereology, and propose why and how it should be applied to the study of adult neurogenesis.

Indexed as

AdultAdult Stem CellsAnimalsBrainDentate GyrusHumansModels, NeurologicalNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID32848155
PMCPMC7450090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.