Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848100›Full record

ReviewExperimental animals2021

Infrared thermal imaging associated with pain in laboratory animals.

Daniel Mota-Rojas, Adriana Olmos-Hernández, Antonio Verduzco-Mendoza, Hugo Lecona-Butrón, Julio Martínez-Burnes, Patricia Mora-Medina, Jocelyn Gómez-Prado, Agustín Orihuela

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental animals, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Thermal Response of Laboratory Rats (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Mota-RojasNeurophysiology, Behaviour and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco, Mexico City, C.P. 04960 Mexico.
Adriana Olmos-HernándezDivision of Biotechnology, Department Bioterio and Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación-Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, C.P. 14389, Mexico.
Antonio Verduzco-MendozaDivision of Biotechnology, Department Bioterio and Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación-Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, C.P. 14389, Mexico.
Hugo Lecona-ButrónDivision of Biotechnology, Department Bioterio and Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación-Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR-LGII), Mexico City, C.P. 14389, Mexico.
Julio Martínez-BurnesGraduate and Research Department, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, C.P. Victoria City, Tamaulipas, C.P. 87000, Mexico.
Patricia Mora-MedinaLivestock Science Department, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), State of Mexico, C.P. 54740, Mexico.
Jocelyn Gómez-PradoNeurophysiology, Behaviour and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco, Mexico City, C.P. 04960 Mexico.
Agustín OrihuelaFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, C.P. 62209, México.
Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación · MXUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MXAutonomous University of Tamaulipas · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The science of animal welfare has evolved over the years, and recent scientific advances have enhanced our comprehension of the neurological, physiological, and ethological mechanisms of diverse animal species. Currently, the study of the affective states (emotions) of nonhuman animals is attracting great scientific interest focused primarily on negative experiences such as pain, fear, and suffering, which animals experience in different stages of their lives or during scientific research. Studies underway today seek to establish methods of evaluation that can accurately measure pain and then develop effective treatments for it, because the techniques available up to now are not sufficiently precise. One innovative technology that has recently been incorporated into veterinary medicine for the specific purpose of studying pain in animals is called infrared thermography (IRT), a technique that works by detecting and measuring levels of thermal radiation at different points on the body's surface with high sensitivity. Changes in IRT images are associated mainly with blood perfusion, which is modulated by the mechanisms of vasodilatation and vasoconstriction. IRT is an efficient, noninvasive method for evaluating and controlling pain, two critical aspects of animal welfare in biomedical research. The aim of the present review is to compile and analyze studies of infrared thermographic changes associated with pain in laboratory research involving animals.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryInfrared RaysAnimalsAnimal WelfareBiomedical ResearchBody TemperaturePainPain MeasurementThermographyVasoconstrictionVasodilationanimalsanimal welfarepainthermal imagesvascular change

Identifiers

PMID32848100
PMCPMC7887630
OpenAlexW3080218209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.