Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848086›Full record

ArticleRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2020

Opioid use among veterans undergoing major joint surgery managed by a multidisciplinary transitional pain service.

Michael J Buys, Kimberlee Bayless, Jennifer Romesser, Zachary Anderson, Shardool Patel, Chong Zhang, Angela P Presson, Benjamin S Brooke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transitional Pain Service: An Update.Current pain and headache reports · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Effect of Multidisciplinary Transitional Pain Service on Health Care Use and Costs Following Orthopedic Surgery.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J BuysDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA michael.buys@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8222-1461
Kimberlee BaylessAnesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jennifer RomesserPsychology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Mental Health Services, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Zachary AndersonAnesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Shardool PatelAnesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Chong ZhangInternal Medicine-Epidemiology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Angela P PressonInternal Medicine-Epidemiology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Benjamin S BrookeSurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
University of Utah · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · USFrontLine Service · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001067 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DERE, WILLARD H., HESS, RACHEL · 2013 to 2017
$19.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001067NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic postsurgical pain and opioid use is a problem among patients undergoing many types of surgical procedures. A multidisciplinary approach to perioperative pain management known as a transitional pain service (TPS) may lower these risks.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Salt Lake City VA Medical Center to compare patients undergoing elective primary or revision total knee, hip, or shoulder replacement or rotator cuff repair in the year before (2017) and after (2018) implementation of a TPS. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients taking opioids 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include new chronic opioid use (COU) after surgery as well as the proportion of previous chronic opioid users who stopped or decreased opioid use after surgery.

resultsAt 90 days after surgery, patients enrolled in TPS were significantly less likely to be taking opioids (13.4% TPS vs 27.3% pre-TPS; p=0.002). This relationship remained statistically significant in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, where the TPS group had 69% lower odds of postoperative COU compared with the preintervention group (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.66; p=0.03). Opioid-naive patients enrolled in TPS were less likely to have new COU after surgery (0.7% TPS vs 8.4% pre-TPS; p=0.004). Further, patients enrolled in TPS with existing COU prior to surgery were more likely to reduce or completely stop opioid use after surgery (67.5% TPS vs 45.3% pre-TPS; p=0.037) as compared with pre-TPS.

conclusionsThese data suggest that a TPS is an effective strategy for preventing new COU and reducing overall opioid use following orthopedic joint procedures in a Veterans Affairs hospital.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersVeteransAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPostoperative PainRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, Opioidacute painanalgesicschronic painopioidopioid-related disorderspainpostoperative

Identifiers

PMID32848086
PMCPMC7784497
OpenAlexW3081208289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.