Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848061›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Evangeline S Ballerini, Ya Min, Molly B Edwards, Elena M Kramer, Scott A Hodges

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Evolution and development of complex floral displays.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evangeline S BalleriniEcology, Evolution and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; ballerini@csus.edu hodges@lifesci.ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4810-2762
Ya MinDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02318.ORCID 0000-0002-7526-4516
Molly B EdwardsDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02318.
Elena M KramerDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02318.ORCID 0000-0002-5757-1088
Scott A HodgesEcology, Evolution and Marine Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; ballerini@csus.edu hodges@lifesci.ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0401-6072
Harvard University · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Pacific Biosciences PacBio RS Single Molecule Real Time SequencerS10OD018174 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ROKHSAR, DANIEL SOLEYMAN · 2014 to 2014
$600k
Acquisition of Covaris E220 and Sciclone G3 systems for high throughput sequencinS10OD010786 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COMAI, LUCA · 2012 to 2012
$311k
Dissecting the Genetic Basis of Adaptive Traits in AquilegiaF32GM103154 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BALLERINI, EVANGELINE S · 2012 to 2014
$163k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM103154NIH HHS S10 OD010786NIH HHS S10 OD018174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of novel features, such as eyes or wings, that allow organisms to exploit their environment in new ways can lead to increased diversification rates. Therefore, understanding the genetic and developmental mechanisms involved in the origin of these key innovations has long been of interest to evolutionary biologists. In flowering plants, floral nectar spurs are a prime example of a key innovation, with the independent evolution of spurs associated with increased diversification rates in multiple angiosperm lineages due to their ability to promote reproductive isolation via pollinator specialization. As none of the traditional plant model taxa have nectar spurs, little is known about the genetic and developmental basis of this trait. Nectar spurs are a defining feature of the columbine genus

Indexed as

Plant ProteinsTranscription FactorsAquilegiaFlowersPlant NectarZinc FingersPlant NectarPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsAquilegiakey innovationmitosisnectar spurpetal development

Identifiers

PMID32848061
PMCPMC7486772
OpenAlexW3080831667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.