Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32848037›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020

Performance of the Lateral Flow Assay and the Latex Agglutination Serum Cryptococcal Antigen Test in Cryptococcal Disease in Patients with and without HIV.

Matthew A Hevey, Ige A George, Adriana M Rauseo, Lindsey Larson, William Powderly, Andrej Spec

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pulmonary cryptococcosis mimicking lung cancer: 3 case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew A HeveyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Ige A GeorgeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Adriana M RauseoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Lindsey LarsonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
William PowderlyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Andrej SpecDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA andrejspec@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7612-4710
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptococcal epidemiology is shifting toward HIV-negative populations who have diverse presentations. Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing is also changing, with development of the lateral flow assay (LFA) having reported increased sensitivity and specificity, but with minimal knowledge in the HIV-negative population. In this study, we evaluate the real-life performance of CrAg testing in patients with cryptococcal disease. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with cryptococcosis from 2002 to 2019 at Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Latex agglutination (LA) was used exclusively until April 2016, at which point LFA was used exclusively. Demographics, presentations, and testing outcomes were evaluated. Serum CrAg testing was completed in 227 patients with cryptococcosis. Of 141 HIV-negative patients, 107 had LA testing and 34 had LFA testing. In patients with disseminated disease, serum CrAg sensitivity by LA was 78.1% compared to 82.6% for LFA. In patients with localized pulmonary disease, serum CrAg sensitivity was 23.5% compared to 90.9% for LFA. Of 86 people living with HIV (PLWH), 76 had LA testing, and 10 had LFA testing. Serum CrAg sensitivity for LA was 94.7% compared to 100% for LFA in patients with disseminated disease. We noted a significant improvement in sensitivity from LA testing to LFA testing, predominantly in those with localized pulmonary disease. However, both LFA and LA appear to be less sensitive in HIV-negative patients than previously described in PLWH.

Indexed as

CryptococcosisCryptococcusHIV InfectionsMeningitis, CryptococcalAntigens, FungalHumansLatex Fixation TestsRetrospective StudiesAntigens, Fungalcryptococcal antigenCryptococcus neoformansdiagnosistest performance

Identifiers

PMID32848037
PMCPMC7587084
OpenAlexW3080304193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.