Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32847920›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Cumulative social disadvantage and hospitalisations due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in Finland in 2011─2013: a register study.

Sonja Lumme, Kristiina Manderbacka, Martti Arffman, Sakari Karvonen, Ilmo Keskimaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Income-related inequalities in ACSC hospitalization in Canada: evidence from 2005-2019 surveys linked with hospitalization and tax data.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sonja LummeDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland sonja.lumme@thl.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-9979-0038
Kristiina ManderbackaDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3668-5382
Martti ArffmanDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Sakari KarvonenDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Ilmo KeskimakiDepartment of Health and Social Care Systems, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FITampere University · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo study the interplay between several indicators of social disadvantage and hospitalisations due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC) in 2011─2013. To evaluate whether the accumulation of preceding social disadvantage in one point of time or prolongation of social disadvantage had an effect on hospitalisations due to ACSCs. Four common indicators of disadvantage are examined: living alone, low level of education, poverty and unemployment.

designA population-based register study.

settingNationwide individual-level register data on hospitalisations due to ACSCs for the years 2011-2013 and preceding data on social and socioeconomic factors for the years 2006─2010.

participantsFinnish residents aged 45 or older on 1 January 2011. OUTCOME MEASURE: Hospitalisations due to ACSCs in 2011-2013. The effect of accumulation of preceding disadvantage in one point of time and its prolongation on ACSCs was studied using modified Poisson regression.

resultsPeople with preceding cumulative social disadvantage were more likely to be hospitalised due to ACSCs. The most hazardous combination was simultaneously living alone, low level of education and poverty among the middle-aged individuals (aged 45-64 years) and the elderly (over 64 years). Risk ratio (RR) of being hospitalised due to ACSC was 3.16 (95% CI 3.03-3.29) among middle-aged men and 3.54 (3.36-3.73) among middle-aged women compared with individuals without any of these risk factors when controlling for age and residential area. For the elderly, the RR was 1.61 (1.57-1.66) among men and 1.69 (1.64-1.74) among women.

conclusionsTo improve social equity in healthcare, it is important to recognise not only patients with cumulative disadvantage but also-as this study shows-patients with particular combinations of disadvantage who may be more susceptible. The identification of these vulnerable patient groups is also necessary to reduce the use of more expensive treatment in specialised healthcare.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareHospitalizationAgedFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factorsorganisation of health servicesprimary carepublic healthquality in health caresocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID32847920
PMCPMC7451287
OpenAlexW3080248935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.