Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32847916›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Determining the optimal dose of reactive balance training after stroke: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Avril Mansfield, Elizabeth L Inness, Cynthia J Danells, David Jagroop, Tanvi Bhatt, Andrew H Huntley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04219696 (Determining the Optimal Dose of Reactive Balance Training After Stroke - a Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04219696 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Determining the Optimal Dose of Reactive Balance Training After Stroke - a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Rehabilitation InstituteRan2020 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsStrokeArmsReactive balance training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Avril MansfieldToronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada avril.mansfield@uhn.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0396-5815
Elizabeth L InnessToronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9217-4619
Cynthia J DanellsToronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David JagroopToronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8764-6258
Tanvi BhattDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andrew H HuntleyToronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9523-304X
University Health Network · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

CIHR MSH-141983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFalls risk poststroke is highest soon after discharge from rehabilitation. Reactive balance training (RBT) aims to improve control of reactions to prevent falling after a loss of balance. In healthy older adults, a single RBT session can lead to lasting improvements in reactive balance control and prevent falls in daily life. While increasing the dose of RBT does not appear to lead to additional benefit for healthy older adults, stroke survivors, who have more severely impaired balance control, may benefit from a higher RBT dose. Our long-term goal is to determine the optimal dose of RBT in people with subacute stroke. This assessor-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial aims to inform the design of a larger trial to address this long-term goal. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants (n=36) will be attending out-patient stroke rehabilitation, and will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: one, three or six RBT sessions. RBT will replace a portion of participants' regular physiotherapy so that the total physical rehabilitation time will be the same for the three groups. Balance and balance confidence will be assessed at: (1) study enrolment; (2) out-patient rehabilitation discharge; and (3) 6 months postdischarge. Participants will report falls and physical activity for 6 months postdischarge. Pilot data will be used to plan the larger trial (ie, sample size estimate using fall rates, and which groups should be included based on between-group trends in pre-to-post training effect sizes for reactive balance control measures). Pilot data will also be used to assess the feasibility of the larger trial (ie, based on the accrual rate, outcome completion rate and feasibility of prescribing specific training doses). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional research ethics approval has been received. Study participants will receive a lay summary of results. We will also publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04219696; Pre results.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAftercareAgedExercise TherapyHumansPatient DischargePilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicrehabilitation medicinestrokestroke medicine

Identifiers

PMID32847916
PMCPMC7451480
OpenAlexW3081212743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.