Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32847903›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

The economic burden of infections following intramedullary nailing for a tibial shaft fracture in England.

Thibaut Galvain, Abhishek Chitnis, Konstantina Paparouni, Cindy Tong, Chantal E Holy, Peter V Giannoudis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcomes of early versus delayed weight-bearing with intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. In Vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of a New TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The economic impact of open lower limb fractures in the Netherlands: a cost-of-illness study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Costs of fracture-related infection: the impact on direct hospital costs and healthcare utilisation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Patient Comorbidities Associated With Acute Infection After Open Tibial Fractures.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Rates and timing of short-term complications following operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
    Article
  17. Current concepts in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of fracture-related infection (FRI).European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Bone infections: local delivery of antibiotics and their effectiveness.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thibaut GalvainDepartment of Health Economics and Market Access, Johnson and Johnson Medical Devices, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France tgalvain@its.jnj.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-249X
Abhishek ChitnisDepartment of Real World Analytics and Research, Johnson and Johnson Medical Devices, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Konstantina PaparouniDepartment of Health Economics and Market Access, DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland.
Cindy TongDepartment of Health Economics and Market Access, Johnson and Johnson Medical Devices, Somerville, New Jersey, USA.
Chantal E HolyDepartment of Real World Analytics and Research, Johnson and Johnson Medical Devices, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Peter V GiannoudisAcademic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Johnson & Johnson (United States) · USJohnson & Johnson (France) · FRUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDetermine the impact of infections on direct costs and healthcare resource use in England for patients undergoing intramedullary nailing (IMN) for tibial shaft fractures.

designNon-concurrent cohort based on retrospectively collected data with 2-year follow-up.

settingEngland.

participantsThe study population included adult patients (≥18 years) in England with a diagnosis of tibial shaft fracture (International Classification of Diseases-10, S822) in the inpatient setting between May 2003 and June 2017 followed by a procedure for IMN for tibial shaft fracture within 30 days. Patient data were derived from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics datasets. PRIMARY INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Infection. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was total inpatient costs from index stay admission through 1 year of follow-up. Secondary outcome included cumulative total healthcare costs, and resource utilisation at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year and 2 years.

resultsOverall, 805 patients met the inclusion criteria. At index inpatient stay, 3.7% had a post-IMN infection, rising to 11.7% at 1 year. One-year inpatient costs were 80% higher for patients with infection (p<0.001). Total costs were estimated to be £14 756 (95% CI £13 123 to £16 593) for patients with infection versus £8279 (95% CI £7946 to £8626). Length of stay (LOS), readmission and reoperation were the key drivers of healthcare costs (all p<0.001). After adjustment, LOS was higher by 109% (95% CI 62% to 169%), from 10.5 days to 21.9 days, for patients with infection. The odds of being readmitted or requiring reoperation were higher by 5.18 times (95% CI 3.01 to 9.13) and 2.47 times (95% CI 1.48 to 4.09), respectively, for patients with infection versus those without infection.

conclusionsPost-IMN infection significantly increases inpatient costs, LOS, readmissions and reoperations associated with tibial fracture fixation. Healthcare burden could be reduced through novel surgical site infection prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryTibial FracturesAdultCost of IllnessEnglandHumansRetrospective StudiesState MedicineTreatment Outcomeaccident & emergency medicineepidemiologyhealth economicsinfection controltrauma managementwound management

Identifiers

PMID32847903
PMCPMC7451536
OpenAlexW3081365838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.