Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32847684›Full record

ArticleClinical radiology2020

Impact of COVID-19 on UK radiology training: a questionnaire study.

S Veerasuri, M Vekeria, S E Davies, R Graham, J C L Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact of Covid-19 on Residency Training in Tertiary Health Institutions in Nigeria: A National Survey.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S VeerasuriSevern PGME School of Radiology, Severn Deanery, Health Education England, Park House, 1200 Parkway, Bristol, BS34 8YU, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, Avon, BA1 3NG, UK. Electronic address: Sowmya.veerasuri@nhs.net.
M VekeriaSevern PGME School of Radiology, Severn Deanery, Health Education England, Park House, 1200 Parkway, Bristol, BS34 8YU, UK.
S E DaviesSevern PGME School of Radiology, Severn Deanery, Health Education England, Park House, 1200 Parkway, Bristol, BS34 8YU, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, Avon, BA1 3NG, UK.
R GrahamSevern PGME School of Radiology, Severn Deanery, Health Education England, Park House, 1200 Parkway, Bristol, BS34 8YU, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, Avon, BA1 3NG, UK.
J C L RodriguesDepartment of Radiology, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath, Avon, BA1 3NG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo understand the impact of COVID-19 on radiology trainee experience and well-being. MATERIALS AND

methodsA questionnaire designed to capture the impact of COVID-19 on radiology training, working patterns, and well-being was sent to all speciality trainees in a regional UK radiology school. The survey was distributed at the beginning of May 2020 and responses collected over 2 weeks. Trainees were questioned about changes that had occurred over a time period starting at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. All survey responses (n=29) were anonymised and the results were subsequently analysed.

resultsSixty-two percent (29 of 47) of trainees within the deanery, who were spread across seven different hospital sites, responded to the questionnaire. All trainees felt that overall radiology workload had decreased in response to COVID-19. Seventy-two percent (21/29) stated that their workload had significantly decreased. Seventy percent (19/27) reported decreased subspecialty experience, and 19% (5/27) reported a complete lack of subspecialty training. Twenty-four percent (7/29) of trainees were redeployed from radiology to clinical ward-based work. Forty-eight percent reported experiencing a worsening in their well-being compared to before the pandemic.

conclusionThe first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on training and well-being. Lessons learnt from this report should help prepare for a second-wave of COVID-19 or future pandemics.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Education, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansInfection ControlMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOrganizational InnovationPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRadiologyRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID32847684
PMCPMC7420949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.