Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32847591›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2020

Psychosocial barriers and enablers of exclusive breastfeeding: lived experiences of mothers in low-income townships, North West Province, South Africa.

Chantell Witten, Nicole Claasen, Herculina S Kruger, Anna Coutsoudis, Herman Grobler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mixed Methods Studies on Breastfeeding: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. An audit of completeness of Road to Health Booklet at a community health centre in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chantell WittenCentre of Excellence for Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. WittenCB@ufs.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0001-5172-279X
Nicole ClaasenAfrica Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Herculina S KrugerCentre of Excellence for Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Anna CoutsoudisPaediatrics & Child Health, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Herman GroblerCommunity Psychosocial Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
North-West University · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of the Free State · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite national efforts to promote exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), South Africa's EBF rate is only 32 %. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of EBF discontinuation and the lived experiences of breastfeeding mothers at postnatal time points 3-14 days, 4-8 weeks, 10-14 weeks and 20-24 weeks.

methodsThis community-based mixed-methods study collected data within a prospective cohort study on sociodemographics, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF) at 6-8 weeks with infant feeding data collected at 4-8, 10-14 and 20-24 weeks from 159 mothers living in low income areas. Six focus groups with 32 mothers with infants aged 6-24 weeks were conducted. Descriptive statistics was used for the quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data.

resultsThe majority of mothers were unmarried (84.9%), living with family (69.2%) and unemployed (74.2%). Exclusive breastfeeding decreased from 34% at 4-8 weeks to 9.7% at 20-24 weeks. Mixed feeding with infant formula increased from 17.0 to 30.6% and food feeding from 3.1 to 54.2%. While there were no statistically significant associations between EBF and any of the quantitative sociodemographic variables, in the qualitative data, codes associated with barriers were more than enablers. The themes were Mothers' attributes (wellbeing, experiences and relationships) with the code mother's stress the strongest barrier, Mother's knowledge, attitudes and practices of breastfeeding with the code conventional medicines the strongest barrier, Family environment with the code home setting the strongest barrier, Social environment with public spaces and places a barrier and in Baby cues the code baby stomach ailments the barrier. Within these same themes mother's positive emotions, benefits of breastfeeding, support in the home, access to information and services from health professionals and baby's health were strong enabling factors.

conclusionsLow EBF, high mixed feeding and a high EPDS score were explained by the barriers identified in the qualitative data. The data suggests that mothers from low-income households would be better supported through interventions that address food insecurity; family relationships and those that build confidence in mothers and resilience in confronting difficult and hostile breastfeeding environments.

Indexed as

AdultBreast FeedingEmploymentFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantMaleMothersPovertyProspective StudiesRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultChallengersExclusive breastfeedingMixed methodsPerceptionsPsychosocial factors

Identifiers

PMID32847591
PMCPMC7449017
OpenAlexW3080975428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.