Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32847522›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2020

Effect of intrathecal lipophilic opioids on the incidence of shivering in women undergoing cesarean delivery after spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and bayesian network meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yamini Subramani, Mahesh Nagappa, Kamal Kumar, Lee-Anne Fochesato, Moaz Bin Yunus Chohan, Yun Fei Zhu, Kevin Armstrong, Sudha Indu Singh

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yamini SubramaniDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre- University Hospital, (LHSC-UH) , London, Ontario, Canada. Yamini.subramani@lhsc.on.ca.
Mahesh NagappaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre- University Hospital, (LHSC-UH) , London, Ontario, Canada.
Kamal KumarDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre- Victoria Hospital, (LHSC-VH) , London, Ontario, Canada.
Lee-Anne FochesatoDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph's Health Care, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Moaz Bin Yunus ChohanDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph's Health Care, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Yun Fei ZhuDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre- University Hospital, (LHSC-UH) , London, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin ArmstrongDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph's Health Care, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Sudha Indu SinghDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, & Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre- University Hospital, (LHSC-UH) , London, Ontario, Canada.
Western University · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CASt Joseph's Health Care · CAVictoria Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShivering is a common side effect in women having cesarean delivery (CD) under spinal anesthesia, which can be bothersome to the patient, and it can also interfere with perioperative monitoring. In several studies, the intrathecal (IT) addition of a lipophilic opioid to local anesthetics has been shown to decrease the incidence of shivering.

objectiveWe performed this network meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of intrathecal lipophilic opioids in preventing the incidence of shivering in patients undergoing CD.

methodsThis review was planned according to the PRISMA for Network Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-NMA) guidelines. An English literature search of multiple electronic databases was conducted. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the incidence of shivering, with study groups receiving either IT fentanyl, sufentanil, or meperidine in women undergoing CD under spinal anesthesia. Quality of the studies was assessed using the modified Oxford scoring system. Using random-effects modeling, dichotomous data were extracted and summarized using odds ratio (OR) with a 95% credible interval (CrI). Statistical analysis was conducted using R studio version 1.0.153 - Inc.

resultsTwenty-one studies consisting of 1433 patients (Control group: 590 patients in twenty-one studies; Fentanyl group:199 patients in seven studies; Sufentanil group: 156 patients in five studies; Meperidine group: 488 patients in ten studies) met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review investigating the effect of intrathecal lipophilic opioids in preventing the incidence of shivering in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Methodological validity scores ranged from 3 to 7. The Bayesian mixed network estimate showed the incidence of shivering was significantly lower with IT fentanyl (pooled odds ratio (OR): 0.13; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.04 to 0.35; P = 0.0004) and IT meperidine (OR: 0.12; 95% CrI: 0.05 to 0.29; P < 0.00001), but not with IT sufentanil (OR: 0.37; 95% CrI: 0.11 to 1.22; P = 0.23). The IT fentanyl group had a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative discomfort [Risk Ratio (RR): 0.19; 95% CI: 0.10-0.35; P < 0.00001], the IT sufentanil group had a significantly higher incidence of pruritus (RR: 6.18; 95% CI: 1.18-32.46; P = 0.03) The IT meperidine group had a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative discomfort (2.7% vs. 13.6%; RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.09-0.55; P = 0.001), but there was a significant increase in nausea and vomiting (IT meperidine group vs. Control group: 42.7% vs. 19.4%; RR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.14-5.75; P = 0.02). Meta-regression analysis based on the opioid dose and quality of the study did not impact the final inference of our result.

conclusionIT fentanyl significantly decreased the incidence of shivering in women undergoing CD under spinal anesthesia without increasing maternal adverse events, confirming that routine use in this patient population is a good choice. IT sufentanil did not decrease the incidence of shivering. IT meperidine decreased the incidence and severity of shivering, but its use was also associated with significant nausea and vomiting.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalBayes TheoremCesarean SectionFemaleFentanylHumansIncidenceInjections, SpinalPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicShiveringSufentanilAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylSufentanil

Identifiers

PMID32847522
PMCPMC7448354
OpenAlexW3080779805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.