Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32847102›Full record

ArticleGenes2020

A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Long-Range Chromatin Interactions.

Thomas Vanhaeren, Federico Divina, Miguel García-Torres, Francisco Gómez-Vela, Wim Vanhoof, Pedro Manuel Martínez-García

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Single-cell Hi-C data analysis: safety in numbers.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Probing infectious disease by single-cell RNA sequencing: Progresses and perspectives.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas VanhaerenDivision of Computer Science, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9638-0121
Federico DivinaDivision of Computer Science, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0964-9506
Miguel García-TorresDivision of Computer Science, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6867-7080
Francisco Gómez-VelaDivision of Computer Science, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7376-5790
Wim VanhoofFaculty of Computer Science, University of Namur, 5000 Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3769-6294
Pedro Manuel Martínez-GarcíaCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa (CABIMER), CSIC-Universidad de Sevilla-Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41092 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2119-2465
Universidad Pablo de Olavide · ESCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa · ESUniversity of Namur · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of three-dimensional genome organization as a critical regulator of gene expression has become increasingly clear over the last decade. Most of our understanding of this association comes from the study of long range chromatin interaction maps provided by Chromatin Conformation Capture-based techniques, which have greatly improved in recent years. Since these procedures are experimentally laborious and expensive, in silico prediction has emerged as an alternative strategy to generate virtual maps in cell types and conditions for which experimental data of chromatin interactions is not available. Several methods have been based on predictive models trained on one-dimensional (1D) sequencing features, yielding promising results. However, different approaches vary both in the way they model chromatin interactions and in the machine learning-based strategy they rely on, making it challenging to carry out performance comparison of existing methods. In this study, we use publicly available 1D sequencing signals to model cohesin-mediated chromatin interactions in two human cell lines and evaluate the prediction performance of six popular machine learning algorithms: decision trees, random forests, gradient boosting, support vector machines, multi-layer perceptron and deep learning. Our approach accurately predicts long-range interactions and reveals that gradient boosting significantly outperforms the other five methods, yielding accuracies of about 95%. We show that chromatin features in close genomic proximity to the anchors cover most of the predictive information, as has been previously reported. Moreover, we demonstrate that gradient boosting models trained with different subsets of chromatin features, unlike the other methods tested, are able to produce accurate predictions. In this regard, and besides architectural proteins, transcription factors are shown to be highly informative. Our study provides a framework for the systematic prediction of long-range chromatin interactions, identifies gradient boosting as the best suited algorithm for this task and highlights cell-type specific binding of transcription factors at the anchors as important determinants of chromatin wiring mediated by cohesin.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationGene Expression Regulation, LeukemicGenome, HumanSupervised Machine LearningChromatinHumansK562 CellsSupport Vector MachineChromatinchromatin interactionsgenome architecturegenomicsmachine-learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID32847102
PMCPMC7563616
OpenAlexW3081406991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.