ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Metastatic Burden Defines Clinically and Biologically Distinct Subgroups of Stage 4 High-Risk Neuroblastoma.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the prognostic subgroups of stage 4 high-risk neuroblastoma based on metastatic burden and explore their distinct clinical and genomic features. Patients aged ≥18 months with stage 4 and metaiodobenzylguanidine-avid neuroblastoma were enrolled. One hundred and thirty eligible patients were treated under the tandem high-dose chemotherapy scheme. Prognostic significance of metastatic burden measured by the modified Curie score was analyzed using a competing risk approach, and the optimal cut-point was determined. Metastasis-specific subgroups (cut-point: 26) were compared using clinicopathological variables, and differential gene expression analysis and gene set variation analysis (GSVA) were performed using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Metastatic burden at diagnosis showed a progressive association with relapse/progression. After applying the cut-point, patients with high metastatic burden showed >3-fold higher risk of relapse/progression than those with low metastatic burden. Moreover, patients with high metastatic burden showed smaller primary tumors and higher biochemical marker levels than those with low metastatic burden. In the genomic analysis, 51 genes were found to be differentially expressed based on the set criteria. GSVA revealed 55 gene sets, which significantly distinguished patients with high metastatic burden from those with low metastatic burden at a false discovery rate <0.25. The results indicated the prognostic significance of metastatic burden in stage 4 high-risk neuroblastoma, and we identified the distinct clinicopathological and genomic features based on metastatic burden. This study may aid in the better understanding and risk-stratification of stage 4 high-risk neuroblastoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.