Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32847061›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

UV-Mediated Photofunctionalization of Dental Implant: A Seven-Year Results of a Prospective Study.

Makoto Hirota, Tomomichi Ozawa, Toshinori Iwai, Kenji Mitsudo, Takahiro Ogawa

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07694388 (Effect of Early Loading on Ultraviolet Photofunctionalized Dental Implants), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07694388 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Early Loading on Ultraviolet Photofunctionalized Dental Implants: A Randomized Controlled Triple-Blind Split-Mouth Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamascus UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled10ConditionsPosterior Mandibular Partial EdentulismArmsUltraviolet Photofunctionalization, Conventional Implant Placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Natural and long-term preservable anticoagulant property of SiOFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Makoto HirotaWeintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, Division of Advanced Prothodontics, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1231-2808
Tomomichi OzawaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Toshinori IwaiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6680-6184
Kenji MitsudoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Takahiro OgawaWeintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, Division of Advanced Prothodontics, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the seven-year results of photofunctionalized implants placed in regular, complex, and cancer-related cases. This study was a prospective, single-center study. Photofunctionalization was performed immediately prior to implantation with Ultraviolet (UV) light for 15 minutes. The success rate of each patient group and the influential factors on implant failure were analyzed. Seventy implants in 16 patients were included. Four implants were left submerged (sleep). The seven-year success rate of 30 implants in regular cases and 21 implants in complex cases was 100%. The success rate of 15 implants in cancer-related cases was 22.2%, in which implants were placed in resection or reconstructed sites with or without pre- or postoperative radiation history. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values increased at second-stage surgery by 3.2 in regular cases and by 21.9 in complex cases, while it decreased by -3.5 in cancer cases. Multivariate analysis indicated that bone quality, location, and cancer resection significantly influenced implant failure. A very reliable seven-year success rate was obtained by UV-photofunctionalized implants in regular and complex cases, even with significant site-development procedures. However, the success rate in cancer cases was significantly and remarkably lower, suggesting remaining challenges of pathophysiologically compromised conditions, such as bone resection, segmental defect, and radiation.

Indexed as

dental implantimplant stabilityoral cancerosseointegrationphotofunctionalization

Identifiers

PMID32847061
PMCPMC7565265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.