Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32846959›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Improved Autophagic Flux in Escapers from Doxorubicin-Induced Senescence/Polyploidy of Breast Cancer Cells.

Agnieszka Bojko, Karolina Staniak, Joanna Czarnecka-Herok, Piotr Sunderland, Magdalena Dudkowska, Małgorzata Alicja Śliwińska, Kristine Salmina, Ewa Sikora

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implications of Heterotypic Cell Fusion in Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Cell Fusion and Syncytia Formation in Cancer.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Agnieszka BojkoLaboratory of Molecular Bases of Aging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteura St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-3300
Karolina StaniakLaboratory of Molecular Bases of Aging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteura St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna Czarnecka-HerokLaboratory of Molecular Bases of Aging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteura St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7287-3615
Piotr SunderlandLaboratory of Molecular Bases of Aging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteura St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena DudkowskaLaboratory of Molecular Bases of Aging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteura St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Małgorzata Alicja ŚliwińskaLaboratory of Imaging Tissue Structure and Function, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteura St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5016-4949
Kristine SalminaCancer Research Division, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Ewa SikoraLaboratory of Molecular Bases of Aging, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 3 Pasteura St., 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-1748
Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PLLatvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre · LV

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2015/17/B/NZ3/03531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The induction of senescence/polyploidization and their role in cancer recurrence is still a poorly explored issue. We showed that MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells underwent reversible senescence/polyploidization upon pulse treatment with doxorubicin (dox). Subsequently, senescent/polyploid cells produced progeny (escapers) that possessed the same amount of DNA as parental cells. In a dox-induced senescence/polyploidization state, the accumulation of autophagy protein markers, such as LC3B II and p62/SQSTM1, was observed. However, the senescent cells were characterized by a very low rate of new autophagosome formation and degradation, estimated by autophagic index. In contrast to senescent cells, escapers had a substantially increased autophagic index and transcription factor EB activation, but a decreased level of an autophagy inhibitor, Rubicon, and autophagic vesicles with non-degraded cargo. These results strongly suggested that autophagy in escapers was improved, especially in MDA-MB-231 cells. The escapers of both cell lines were also susceptible to dox-induced senescence. However, MDA-MB-231 cells which escaped from senescence were characterized by a lower number of γH2AX foci and a different pattern of interleukin synthesis than senescent cells. Thus, our studies showed that breast cancer cells can undergo senescence uncoupled from autophagy status, but autophagic flux resumption may be indispensable in cancer cell escape from senescence/polyploidy.

Indexed as

PolyploidyTumor EscapeActive Transport, Cell NucleusAutophagyBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCellular SenescenceDoxorubicinFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsProtein TransportBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsDoxorubicinTFEB protein, humanautophagic indexautophagycancerDNA damagepolyploidyRubiconsenescencesenescence escapeSQSTM1/p62TFEB

Identifiers

PMID32846959
PMCPMC7504443
OpenAlexW3081318352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.