ArticleMedicine2020
Treatment of dysphagia after stroke with acupuncture and related therapies: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of dietary training combined with acupuncture based on syndrome differentiation for treating dysphagia in stroke rehabilitation patients.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysphagia is a common complication after stroke, with high disability rate and high fatality rate. Although several clinical studies and evidence-based medicine have demonstrated the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of dysphagia after stroke, there are significant differences in study design and intervention methods. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of different acupuncture and related therapies in the treatment of dysphagia after stroke, so as to provide a superior clinical program.
methodsWe will search 7 databases for randomized controlled trials of acupuncture-related therapies for dysphagia after stroke, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biological Medicine, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, and wan-fang databases, from the date of the establishment of each database to March 31, 2020. The network meta-analysis will be implemented through Aggregate Data Drug Information System 1.16.8 and Stata 13.0 software. Clinical Efficiency, videofluoroscopic swallowing study score and Kubota Drinking Water Test grade will be the primary outcomes, Swallowing disorder specific quality of life score, Standardized Assessment and Adverse effects will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. Mean differences or odds ratios will be used for statistical analysis. We will ensure the reliability of the results through node-split model and heterogeneity analysis. In addition, methodological quality will be evaluated based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool, and the quality of evidence will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.
resultsThis study will provide a reliable evidence for the selection of acupuncture and related therapies for dysphagia after stroke.
conclusionThe results of this study will provide references for evaluating the influence of acupuncture and related therapies for dysphagia after stroke, and provide decision-making references for clinical research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study did not require ethical approval. We will disseminate our findings by publishing results in a peer-reviewed journal. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/TAHND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.