Observational studyMedicine2020
Comparison of tendon suture fixation and cortical screw fixation for treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A case-control study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disclosed Industry Funding Does Not Increase Positive Outcomes in Studies on Suture Button Fixation for Ankle Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Avoiding the Removal of Syndesmotic Screws after Distal Tibiofibular Diastasis Repair: A Benefit or a Drawback?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tendon suture fixation versus cortical screw fixation for the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.This study recruited 42 patients with Danis-Weber type B, C1 and C2 fractures concomitant with lower tibiofibular syndesmosis injury, who were randomly assigned to 2 groups according to treatment with cortical screw fixation (n = 21) and tendon suture fixation (n = 21). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to full weight-bearing activity, medical cost, ankle function, and ankle pain were compared between the 2 groups.The operation time was significantly less with cortical screw fixation (57.1 ± 5.3 min) than with tendon suture fixation (63.3 ± 6.3 min; p = 0.01), but there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss. The time until full weight-bearing was possible was significantly longer after cortical screw fixation (10.9 ± 2.7 weeks) than after tendon suture fixation (7.1 ± 1.9 weeks; P < .001). The medical cost was much greater for cortical screw fixation (1861.6 ± 187.3 USD) than for tendon suture fixation (1209.6 ± 97.6 USD; P < .01). The rate of excellent and good ankle function at 3 months after surgery was significantly higher with tendon suture fixation (71.4%) than with cortical screw fixation (33.3%; P = .03).Tendon suture fixation is associated with quicker recovery of ankle function, shorter time to full weight-bearing, and lower medical cost to the patient compared with screw fixation. Our findings suggest that tendon suture fixation is an effective method for the treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.