Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32846754›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Gastrointestinal endoscopy nurse assistance during colonoscopy and polyp detection: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Aihong Liu, Huashe Wang, Yijia Lin, Liping Fu, Yanan Liu, Shuhong Yan, Honglei Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05513261 (PolyDeep Advance 3), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05513261 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

PolyDeep Advance 3: Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing High Definition Colonoscopy With PolyDeep Assisted High Definition Colonoscopy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacin Biomedica Galicia SurRan2023 to 2024Enrolled857ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsHigh definition colonoscopy (standard colonoscopy) in Adenoma Detection Rate, PolyDeep assisted high definition colonoscopy (CAD system) in Adenoma Detection Rate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Aihong LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
Huashe WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
Yijia LinDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
Liping FuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Guangzhou.
Yanan LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Guangzhou.
Shuhong YanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
Honglei ChenGastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-5860-4734
Obuda University · HUSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies showed difference results about the effect of nurse in improvement of the colonoscopy detection rate. This meta-analysis aims to investigate whether nurse participation during colonoscopy can help in improving the detection rate of polyps and adenomas.

methodsOriginal studies in English were searched from the MEDLINE database, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database. Randomized control trials (RCT) comparing colonoscopy with and without nurse participation for the detection of colorectal polyps and adenomas were identified. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3 software.

resultsA total of 2268 patients from 4 RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Outcomes of colonoscopy with nurse participation were compared with those of colonoscopy without nurse participation. The results showed that nurses' participation during colonoscopy could significantly increase both, polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate.

conclusionNurse assistance during colonoscopy can help improve the rate of detection of polyps and adenomas.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonoscopyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID32846754
PMCPMC7447493
OpenAlexW3079331049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.