Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32846152›Full record

ReviewPhysiology & behavior2020

'Liking' and 'wanting' in eating and food reward: Brain mechanisms and clinical implications.

Ileana Morales, Kent C Berridge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology & behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Weight Suppression, Brain Reward Response to Food Cues, and Bulimic Behaviours: A Pilot fMRI Study.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Neural circuits regulating activity-based anorexia.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Hedonic hotspot in rat olfactory tubercle: map for mu-opioid, orexin, and muscimol enhancement of sucrose 'liking'.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  20. Optogenetic Hedonic Hotspots in the Orbitofrontal Cortex and Insula: Causing Enhancement of Sweetness "Liking".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ileana MoralesDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1043, United States. Electronic address: ileanamo@umich.edu.
Kent C BerridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1043, United States.

Funding

Sensory Mechanisms and Disorders - Administrative SupplementT32DC000011 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Michael Thomas Roberts · 1989 to 2026
$9.5M
Affective neuroscience of taste reactivityR01MH063649 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2002 to 2024
$7.8M
Cue-triggered Reward SeekingR01DA015188 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2003 to 2021
$4.9M
Brain hedonic circuitry mediating 'liking' and 'wanting' for reward (Administrative Supplement/Funded Extension)F99NS124176 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORALES, ILEANA · 2021 to 2024
$106k
Hedonic hotspot interactions for the generation of 'liking' and 'wanting'F31MH125613 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORALES, ILEANA · 2021 to 2021
$30k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015188NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000011NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH125613NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063649NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS124176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is becoming clearer how neurobiological mechanisms generate 'liking' and 'wanting' components of food reward. Mesocorticolimbic mechanisms that enhance 'liking' include brain hedonic hotspots, which are specialized subregions that are uniquely able to causally amplify the hedonic impact of palatable tastes. Hedonic hotspots are found in nucleus accumbens medial shell, ventral pallidum, orbitofrontal cortex, insula cortex, and brainstem. In turn, a much larger mesocorticolimbic circuitry generates 'wanting' or incentive motivation to obtain and consume food rewards. Hedonic and motivational circuitry interact together and with hypothalamic homeostatic circuitry, allowing relevant physiological hunger and satiety states to modulate 'liking' and 'wanting' for food rewards. In some conditions such as drug addiction, 'wanting' is known to dramatically detach from 'liking' for the same reward, and this may also occur in over-eating disorders. Via incentive sensitization, 'wanting' selectively becomes higher, especially when triggered by reward cues when encountered in vulnerable states of stress, etc. Emerging evidence suggests that some cases of obesity and binge eating disorders may reflect an incentive-sensitization brain signature of cue hyper-reactivity, causing excessive 'wanting' to eat. Future findings on the neurobiological bases of 'liking' and 'wanting' can continue to improve understanding of both normal food reward and causes of clinical eating disorders.

Indexed as

MotivationRewardBrainFoodFood PreferencesFeeding‘Liking’Nucleus accumbensPrefrontal cortexVentral pallidum‘Wanting’

Identifiers

PMID32846152
PMCPMC7655589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.