ReviewExperimental eye research2020
Nonlinear optical crosslinking (NLO CXL) for correcting refractive errors.
Review in Experimental eye research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced Riboflavin Stromal Delivery Using Microchannel-Assisted Iontophoresis for Corneal Crosslinking.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of keratoconus.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
- Femtosecond laser applications in corneal surgery.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Keratoconus: exploring fundamentals and future perspectives - a comprehensive systematic review.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ultraviolet A (UVA) light-based photoactivation of riboflavin (Rf) to induce corneal crosslinking (CXL) and mechanical stiffening is now a well-known treatment for corneal ectasia and Keratoconus that is being used in a topographically guided photorefractive intrastromal CXL (PiXL) procedure to treat low degrees of refractive errors. Alternative approaches for non-invasive treatment of refractive errors have also been proposed that use femtosecond lasers (FS) that provide much faster, more precise, and safer results than UVA CXL. One such treatment, nonlinear optical crosslinking (NLO CXL), has been able to replicate the effects of UVA CXL, while producing a smaller area of cellular damage and requiring a shorter procedure time. Unlike UVA CXL, the treatment volume of NLO CXL only occurs within the focal volume of the laser, which can be placed at any depth and scanned into any pattern for true topographically guided refractive correction. This review presents our experience with using FS lasers to photoactivate Rf and perform highly controlled corneal CXL that leads to mechanical stiffening and changes in corneal shape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.