ArticleRadiation research2020
DNA Dosimeter Measurement of Relative Biological Effectiveness for 160 kVp and 6 MV X Rays.
Article in Radiation research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of a Low-Energy Cyclotron-Based Proton Beam for Preclinical Radiobiological Studies.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Assessing the DNA Damaging Effectiveness of Ionizing Radiation Using Plasmid DNA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- EURADOS STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA 2020: VISION FOR THE DOSIMETRY OF IONISING RADIATION.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we developed a DNA dosimeter, consisting of 4-kb DNA strands attached to magnetic streptavidin beads and labeled with fluorescein, to detect double-strand breaks (DSBs). The purpose here was to evaluate whether the DNA dosimeter readings reflect the relative biological effects of 160 kVp and 6 MV X rays. AVarian 600 C/D linac (6 MV) and a Faxitron cabinet X-ray system (160 kVp), both calibrated using traceable methods, were used to deliver high- and low-energy photons, respectively, to DNA dosimeters and multiple cell lines (mNs-5, HT-22 and Daoy). The responses were fit versus dose, and were used to quantify the dose of low-energy photons that produced the same response as that of the high-energy photons, at doses of 3, 6 and 9 Gy. The equivalent doses were utilized to calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBEDSB and RBEcell survival). Additionally, a neutral comet assay was performed to measure the amount of intracellular DNA DSB, and ultimately the RBEcomet assay. The results of this work showed 160-kVp photon RBE values and 95% confidence intervals of 1.12 ± 0.04 (mNS-5), 1.16 ± 0.06 (HT-22), 1.25 ± 0.09 (Daoy) and 1.21 ± 0.24 (DNA dosimeter) at 9 Gy and 1.32 ± 0.16 (comet assay) at 3 Gy. Within the current error, the DNA dosimeter measured RBEDSB values in agreement with the RBEcell survival and assay from the cell survival and comet assay RBEcomet measurements. These results suggest that the DNA dosimeter can measure the changes in the radiobiological effects from different energy photons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.