Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32845782›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Immunogenicity and safety of the first indigenously developed Indian tetravalent influenza vaccine (split virion) in healthy children (6 months to 17 years of age): a randomized, multicenter, phase III clinical trial.

Sumantra Sarkar, Chandrakant Bokade, Kapil Garg, Ravi Kumar, Jayesh Sanmukhani, Ravindra Mittal

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Efficacy and safety of pediatric flu vaccination: a systematic review].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sumantra SarkarDepartment of Pediatrics, IPGMER & SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Chandrakant BokadeDepartment of Pediatrics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Medical College Square, Nagpur, India.
Kapil GargDepartment of Paediatrics, Jay Kay Lon Hospital SMS Medical College, Jaipur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7956-310X
Ravi KumarDepartment of Pediatrics, Niloufer Hospital (Affiliated to Osmania Medical College), Hyderabad, India.
Jayesh SanmukhaniDepartment of Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, Cadila Healthcare Limited, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-4431
Ravindra MittalDepartment of Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, Cadila Healthcare Limited, India.
Cadila Healthcare (India) · INGovernment Medical College · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INNiloufer Hospital · INSMS Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase III clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the Tetravalent Influenza Vaccine (Split virion) I.P. (TetIV), containing two strains each of influenza A and B, developed indigenously in the country for the first time by M/s Cadila Healthcare Limited, India for use in the pediatric population (6 months -17 years of age), and compare it to that of a licensed seasonal Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TriIV) of Sanofi Pasteur India Private Limited, containing two influenza A and one influenza B strains. Three hundred six subjects of either sex, 6 months to 17 years of age, were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TetIV or TriIV. Immunogenicity assessments (antibodies against A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Phuket, and B/Brisbane) were performed using the hemagglutination inhibition assay at baseline and 28 days after the last vaccination. TetIV was found to fulfill the criteria set by the United States Food and Drug Administration on the requirements of clinical data for licensure of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccines for the pediatric population. The seroconversion rates with TetIV were 94.6% for A/H1N1, 93.9% for A/H3N2, 91.2% for B/Brisbane, and 87.2% for B/Phuket strains. TetIV showed non-inferiority and superiority in immune response, as compared to TriIV, against the shared strains and an additional B strain, respectively. Both the vaccines were tolerated well by all the study participants, and an addition of the fourth strain in TetIV did not compromise the safety as compared to that of TriIV. The most common adverse event reported in both groups was fever.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAntibodies, ViralChildHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineIndiaInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeVaccines, CombinedVaccines, InactivatedVirionAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, CombinedVaccines, Inactivatedcadila Healthcare Limitedchildrenimmunogenicitysanofi PasteurTetravalent influenza vaccinetrivalent influenza vaccinevaxi-flu 4vaxigrip

Identifiers

PMID32845782
PMCPMC7993130
OpenAlexW3080492640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.