ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2020
How Imaging Can Assist with Diagnosis and Monitoring of Disease in Myositis.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Semi-quantitative analyses of muscle magnetic resonance imaging for pattern recognition in early idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- MGB-Unet: An Improved Multiscale Unet with Bottleneck Transformer for Myositis Segmentation from Ultrasound Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Necrotizing autoimmune myositis following coronavirus disease 2019 infection: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo summarize recent findings and progression in the field of imaging of inflammatory myopathies. The most commonly used method is magnetic resonance imaging, and the article focuses on this technique, but covers also several other less frequently used or emerging methods. RECENT
findingsA relatively good agreement exists regarding some technical parameters, area of investigation, and assessment of inflammatory activity and chronic damage using magnetic resonance imaging. There are inconsistent data available with respect to distribution of involvement in individual IIM subtypes. Ultrasound and other imaging methods lack the validation and still face many unresolved problems. Imaging plays a crucial role in the evaluation of impairment in patients with IIMs. The future research should be focused on standardization of each method in order to obtain comparable results and on defining the most appropriate indications of their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.