Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32845396›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2020

Turning the Page in Osteoarthritis Assessment with the Use of Ultrasound.

Amanda E Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Osteoarthritis early-, mid- and late-stage progression in the rat medial meniscus transection model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda E NelsonDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3300 Doc J. Thurston Building, Campus Box #7280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7280, USA. aenelson@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Development of an AI/ML-ready knee ultrasound dataset in a population-based cohortR01AR077060 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NELSON, AMANDA E · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review summarizes the last 5 years of published, peer-reviewed research on the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) in osteoarthritis (OA). RECENT

findingsMultiple features relevant to OA can be visualized on US, including synovitis, erosion, enthesitis, osteophytes, cartilage damage, meniscal extrusion, and popliteal cysts. US can be used to confirm a diagnosis of OA or make an alternate diagnosis in the clinical setting. When a standardized protocol is used, US is a reliable modality for assessment of the features of OA. Findings on US can predict progression and response to therapy in OA of the hand and knee and can allow characterization of risk factors in a cost-effective, non-invasive, repeatable manner. US is becoming more widely used in OA imaging and has clear value in addition to radiography and clinical assessment. US will likely prove useful in defining phenotypes and providing treatment guidance in OA.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeUltrasonographyHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingSynovitisCartilageImagingOsteoarthritisOsteophytesSynovitisUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32845396
PMCPMC7887707
OpenAlexW3080743626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.